Read more at https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/asia/malaysia-najib-high-speed-rail-hsr-azmin-ali-10540090
(Updated: )
Ricky Lim
"The Attorney-General has studied the contents of the bilateral HSR agreement signed on Dec 13, 2016 and gave his legal opinions, which I presented to the cabinet on Jul 11, 2018," said Azmin.
"The AG gave his view that this matter must be settled according to the law and via bilateral negotiations. Based on this advice, we are studying all options available.
--
This is the 1st reasonable statement that come out from the Malaysia Cabinet.
We should take note of it positively and hopefully, it will be a constructive meeting to resolve the HSR issue.
"The AG gave his view that this matter must be settled according to the law and via bilateral negotiations. Based on this advice, we are studying all options available.
--
This is the 1st reasonable statement that come out from the Malaysia Cabinet.
We should take note of it positively and hopefully, it will be a constructive meeting to resolve the HSR issue.
LikeReply1m
Ricky Lim
"I will lead a visit to Singapore in the near future to have a discussion to reach an agreement with the Singapore Government for a fair and just resolution while maintaining the long-standing diplomatic ties between Malaysia and Singapore," said said Azmin.
---
We should also note that the Economic Affair Minister wish to "maintain the long-standing diplomatic ties between Malaysia and Singapore,"
This is also another amicable statement that we take note of.
--
As for the statement "have a discussion to reach an agreement with the Singapore Government for a fair and just resolution" ---- it will be guided by the agreement signed by both parties.
---
We should also note that the Economic Affair Minister wish to "maintain the long-standing diplomatic ties between Malaysia and Singapore,"
This is also another amicable statement that we take note of.
--
As for the statement "have a discussion to reach an agreement with the Singapore Government for a fair and just resolution" ---- it will be guided by the agreement signed by both parties.
LikeReply 1m
Ricky Lim
Interestingly, Malaysia has appointed a Economic Affair Minister (instead of a Transport Minister) to discuss the HSR issue.
Which lead to the point of :-
Posted in :- 16 Jul 2018 06:09PM (Updated: 16 Jul 2018 06:13PM)
Ricky Lim
There are always some misperception about justifying high cost infrastructure project - and he correlation to direct collection of fees to recoup the capital cost.
Cost & Benefit Analysis done in this manner - will always result in a project no go - because multi-million or billions infra cost - will never be able to be recoup by collection of fares.
It is the Economic activities provided by the infra access - that need to be added into the equation of the Cost & Benefit Analysis - before a project can be determined if indeed cost outweigh benefits or benefits outweigh costs.
Because if the CBA is negative, our side will never approve this project and this project will never have gone ahead - because our side are usually very careful in spending our taxpayers money.
I think there is no need to teach Dr M smart.
But since this is a Malaysia project - no point to make Malaysian smart - just go ahead to cancel it ---- but make sure Malaysia pay Singapore the compensation as per the agreement.
Like · Reply · 1m
Ricky Lim
Scenario 1
Thus for a politicians who want to cancel the HSR project, it will justify CBA by :-
(1) Computing planning, design, building and operation cost of HSR.
(2) Computing fare charges for the duration of the lifespan of HSR.
Outcome :- Cost > Benefits = Project not feasible.
Conclusion :- Project Cancel
Scenario 2
For CBA calculated based on Economic Benefits:-
(1) Computing planning, design, building and operation cost of HSR.
(2) Computing fare charges for the duration of the lifespan of HSR.
(3) Projected Economic Activities and the Multiplier Effects. (No need to elaborate - why make Dr M smart?)
Outcome :- Cost < Benefits = Project is it feasible (go and guess)
Conclusion :- Project to go ahead or not (go and guess).
Since Malaysia is not keen on the HSR project - go ahead to work out the CBA based on scenario 1 - and kill the project.
(But remember to compensate Singapore based on the agreement).
Then we can close the chapter amicably.
Which lead to the point of :-
Posted in :- 16 Jul 2018 06:09PM (Updated: 16 Jul 2018 06:13PM)
Ricky Lim
There are always some misperception about justifying high cost infrastructure project - and he correlation to direct collection of fees to recoup the capital cost.
Cost & Benefit Analysis done in this manner - will always result in a project no go - because multi-million or billions infra cost - will never be able to be recoup by collection of fares.
It is the Economic activities provided by the infra access - that need to be added into the equation of the Cost & Benefit Analysis - before a project can be determined if indeed cost outweigh benefits or benefits outweigh costs.
Because if the CBA is negative, our side will never approve this project and this project will never have gone ahead - because our side are usually very careful in spending our taxpayers money.
I think there is no need to teach Dr M smart.
But since this is a Malaysia project - no point to make Malaysian smart - just go ahead to cancel it ---- but make sure Malaysia pay Singapore the compensation as per the agreement.
Like · Reply · 1m
Ricky Lim
Scenario 1
Thus for a politicians who want to cancel the HSR project, it will justify CBA by :-
(1) Computing planning, design, building and operation cost of HSR.
(2) Computing fare charges for the duration of the lifespan of HSR.
Outcome :- Cost > Benefits = Project not feasible.
Conclusion :- Project Cancel
Scenario 2
For CBA calculated based on Economic Benefits:-
(1) Computing planning, design, building and operation cost of HSR.
(2) Computing fare charges for the duration of the lifespan of HSR.
(3) Projected Economic Activities and the Multiplier Effects. (No need to elaborate - why make Dr M smart?)
Outcome :- Cost < Benefits = Project is it feasible (go and guess)
Conclusion :- Project to go ahead or not (go and guess).
Since Malaysia is not keen on the HSR project - go ahead to work out the CBA based on scenario 1 - and kill the project.
(But remember to compensate Singapore based on the agreement).
Then we can close the chapter amicably.
No comments:
Post a Comment