Friday, March 18, 2016


Wrong to further punish servicemen for NSF’s death: MINDEF

March 18, 2016

ricky l


The following is posted in :- March 7, 2016
ricky l
ricky l32 seconds ago
The outcome of the investigation of this particular unfortunate incident is to achieve 3 goals :-
(1) thouse who found negligence in jeopardising the lives of NSmen while in training should be punished - so that they will pay for their negligent act of breaching safety rules and take away an innocent life - who are there to train and protect the Country - not to sacrifice their lives mindlessly due to safety officers breaching safety rules during training.
(2) compensation to be offered to the victim family as consolation to help the family tie over the grief and loss of the victim that gave his life to the Country during training.
(3) put in additional safety measures and safeguard so that no future NSmen will suffer from similar negligence act whereby conducting officers and safety officers breach safety rules.
In this case, the above 3 objectives seem to have been met - and look like the mother's personal action is extra-judical as :-
(1) the officers had been punished by the Military Court
(2) compensation had been awarded
(3) additional safeguard such as refrain from using similar smoke grenade and imposing estra safeguard to prevent conducting officers from breaching safety rules.
Reply
ricky l
ricky l21 seconds ago
Military Court had meted out the punishment.
Compensation have been made.
So if a public sue again in a civil court - it means there are double punishment - punishment on top of punishment.
Reply

No comments:

Post a Comment