Monday, April 2, 2018

US blasts 'unfair' Chinese tariffs on 128 products
Read more at https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/business/us-blasts-unfair-chinese-tariffs-on-128-products-10098014

 (Updated: )

Ricky Lim · 

Posted on:- 02 Apr 2018

Ricky Lim ·
Singapore
Trump is a big bully in waging trade war against the World and use coercion on his many of his trade partners.

It is time to inflict pain on Trump - as a bully will only learn if pain is inflicted on him.
Like · Reply · 1m · Edited

Ricky Lim ·
Singapore
And the retaliatory tariffs hit at the very heart of Trump agricultural base who are strong supporters of Trump.

Now let see whether these voters will continue to vote for Trump to be the bully.
Like · Reply · 1m


Jessis Ng
Ricky Lim trump gonna hit them hard. 50 billion tariff on china good coming, trump will win in this trade war.
Like · Reply · 1 · 3h

Ricky Lim · 
Singapore
Jessis Ng - Let see who win in the end.

Trump has no real trade friends and trade partners.

China has many trading partners and the World market.

Use your math to compute who will eventually win.

BTW you are a guy - don't hide yourself as a girl.
Like · Reply · 1m

Ricky Lim · Singapore
Read this and use your calculator to compute - and you will know who will win.

Boeing to sell 300 planes worth $37 billion to China.
Boeing has forecast that Chinese airlines will buy 7,240 commercial aircraft worth $1.1 trillion between now and 2036.

Use your calculator to calculate who will lose?
Or whether your calculator can insert all the figures inside.

BTW you are a Singaporean guy disgusing as a girl.
And your postings is hurting our interest.
Don't know what you are up to.
Like · Reply · 1m
LikeReply1m
Ricky Lim · 

Trump is becoming the backfire president
Rick Newman 10 hours ago
Reactions Sign in to like Reblog on Tumblr Share Tweet Email

Video not available
Unfortunately, this video is no longer available.
SS-100-200
If you were Jeff Bezos, what would you do?

The Amazon (AMZN) CEO faces a new dilemma, since President Trump is now threatening punitive action against his company—and may have the power to follow through.

Trump argues (in a series of tweets) that Amazon gets a sweetheart deal with the US Postal Service, shipping products below cost, with taxpayers essentially subsidizing the deliveries.

That’s probably not true. The Postal Service’s contract with Amazon is private, so we can’t know for sure, but federal law requires the USPS to price package delivery at rates that are profitable. Package delivery is actually a bright spot for the Postal Service—an area of growth amid a long-term decline in regular mail. Instead of ripping off the USPS, Amazon is probably helping keep it alive.

Trump can’t just tear up Amazon’s contract with the USPS. But he could insist on tougher terms whenever the contract is up for renewal. He could also put regulatory barriers in the company’s way, even if courts might strike them down, which helps explain why Amazon’s stock has tanked since Trump started his latest tirade against the company.

So if you were Jeff Bezos, what would you do?

You’d probably explore options for reducing your exposure to Trump and the government he oversees. Amazon already plans to develop its own logistics business, with a pilot program due to start later this year. It might make sense to speed that up and go big, so that Amazon can deliver its own packages and free itself of political meddling relating to the Postal Service.

If it did, the Postal Service would lose one of its biggest customers, while gaining a tough new competitor in the (lousy) bargain. That could make the Service’s chronic financial woes even worse. But Trump doesn’t seem to care about the consequences of his actions—which is turning him into the backfire president.

Trade-war jitters

The Trump tariffs are on the verge of backfiring, with China announcing retaliatory measures and financial markets quivering at the prospect of escalating trade disputes. The new China tariffs would cover about $3 billion of US imports to China, matching duties Trump plans to impose on about $3 billion of aluminum and steel imported to the United States from China. But much bigger retaliations are probably coming. In addition to the steel and aluminum tariffs, Trump has announced new tariffs on about $60 billion of other Chinese imports, and China is likely to respond in kind with tariffs on the same value of U.S. imports to China.

Trade-war jitters, triggered largely by Trump, have helped send the S&P 500 down more than 4% so far this year—despite tax cuts that should push both profits and stock prices up. Trump watches markets closely and probably assumes stocks will recover. Yet he recently threatened, again, to single-handedly kill the North American Free Trade Agreement, which would undoubtedly send stocks down even further. Stock prices are signaling a significant problem.

Trump’s decision last fall to kill DACA, the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, is also in the process of backfiring. Trump ordered Congress to pass a law resolving the fate of some 800,000 “Dreamers” brought to the United States illegally as children. But Congress hasn’t, and doesn’t seem likely to, at least not this year. Courts are now reviewing whether Trump’s action is allowable, while Trump fumes—over his own decision.

What other Trump moves might misfire? His tax cuts could certainly have a downside, since they’re likely to stoke economic growth this year, but perhaps curtail it after that. Lower corporate tax rates will leave companies with more money to spend. But the government will lose revenue and have to borrow more, which could crowd out private investment and depress growth. And if voters think the tax cuts mainly benefit the wealthy, they could punish Republicans by voting against them during the midterm elections in November.

Trump is shrewd in at least one crucial way—he knows how to connect with voters fed up with self-important politicians who talk down to them. But Trump also seems so sure of his own success that he disregards consequences likely to jeopardize his own goals.

Americans generally like Amazon. They want stocks to go up, not down. They’re inclined to let Dreamers stay. And they don’t want major disruptions to the economy. Trump acts as if everything will all work out, no matter how loudly he barks. There are a growing number of indicators he’s wrong.

Confidential tip line: rickjnewman@yahoo.com. Encrypted communication available.
LikeReply1m

Dave · 
Ricky Lim, reasonable write up. What most or myself r looking for is as objective s possible. Thus trump must not appear to b most hopeless or the best of all though me must not forget rightly or wrongly, he had the mandate to rule n decide for USA ppl n perhaps the world.
Reply2h
Ricky Lim · 
Everyone keep their eyes and ears open ---- and see how all these trade wars backfire on Trump.

Just wait a bit longer.
LikeReply1m
Ooi Seng Teong
They set the rules and when the rules became unfavorable to them, the shift the goal posts.
LikeReply73h
Richard Kam · 
When China sets tariff they are Unfair But when US sets tariff it is OK. So US is still using the idiom as their motto Heads I win Tails you loose?
LikeReply52h
Xing Chuteng
Last time they do this to Japan but Japan is helpless as it is no match for the mighty power.
To imposs tariff to a big country like China, it will backfire and hurt ownselves.
LikeReply32h
Eddie Cheang
So, that means you can hit me but I can't hit back.
LikeReply32h
Kwong Ngan Yap
Stupid trade wars.
LikeReply11h
Raymond Chan · 
US is wavering in its policy. You impose tariffs and then allowed exemption. In the end the rule is diluted or at worst not effective.
LikeReply132m
Meio Lin · 
有来无往不成礼!
LikeReply113m
Heng Meng Lim
霸道成性
Reply3m

Jim Tan · 
Gone are the days where white trash trampled over china
The reality is beginning to creep in
LikeReply5m
Meio Lin · 

中国几千年的內忧外患,早已练就金刚身!这只是一道前菜(开胃菜)罢了!
LikeReply6m
Xing Chuteng
By imposing tariff on selected countries is against the WTO on free trade.
The one who lift the whipping stick now making noise as unfair.
Yes they can bully others but not a big and rich China today.
LikeReply1m

No comments:

Post a Comment