Read more at https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/business/temasek-holdings-annual-review-net-portfolio-value-11704272
(Updated: )
Danny Lum
(1) Well done for Temasek Holdings.
(2) Overall both Temasek and MAS Sovereign Fund - do very well this year.
(3) GIC is more Conservative and adopt a more defensive nature in investment - but still maintain a healthy return - comparable to last year.
(4) This means NIRC (Net Income Return Contribution) - for this year will be higher and will boost the Government revenue - and reduce the pressure for higher tax.
(2) Overall both Temasek and MAS Sovereign Fund - do very well this year.
(3) GIC is more Conservative and adopt a more defensive nature in investment - but still maintain a healthy return - comparable to last year.
(4) This means NIRC (Net Income Return Contribution) - for this year will be higher and will boost the Government revenue - and reduce the pressure for higher tax.
Like · Reply · 1m
Lau Lan Chu
After reading some comments really makes me wonder these people got brain or not, or simply dumb. Lose money very happy got something to say . Make money becomes sceptical if news is true. Ultimately this is everyone money, they would rather don't believe or preferred to lose or what?
Reply · 23h
Nick Lai
Lau Lan Chu
Read the financial
Get expert to talk
Read the financial
Get expert to talk
Reply · 18h
Danny Lum
Lau Lan Chu -
(1) Simple, just state the facts and explain the facts.
(2) Compare the performance - are we better off or worst off under the circumstances we are in.
(3) Once done, everyone can see that these people's criticism can no longer stand water.
(4) The overall assessment is that, our overall total Sovereign Funds - GIC, Temasek and MAS have been doing very well ----- growing our Nation wealth assets - systematically, prudently and steadily ---- which is very good for the Nation.
(5) Conservatively, our total Sovereign Funds assets have exceeded S$1 trillion ---- which is very good performance.
(6) Singaporeans shall take consolation that the Government has indeed grow and improve our Nation Wealth leap and bound.
(1) Simple, just state the facts and explain the facts.
(2) Compare the performance - are we better off or worst off under the circumstances we are in.
(3) Once done, everyone can see that these people's criticism can no longer stand water.
(4) The overall assessment is that, our overall total Sovereign Funds - GIC, Temasek and MAS have been doing very well ----- growing our Nation wealth assets - systematically, prudently and steadily ---- which is very good for the Nation.
(5) Conservatively, our total Sovereign Funds assets have exceeded S$1 trillion ---- which is very good performance.
(6) Singaporeans shall take consolation that the Government has indeed grow and improve our Nation Wealth leap and bound.
Foong Mun Loh
LOL..........injection of funds more like......just look at their recent disasters in Salt Bae and Bayer............among many others...........if really profitable, then why resist audit for so many decades ??
Like · Reply · 2m
Zak Salleh-Chew
Returns went down from 12.19% to 1.49%. That's a 84% drop in shareholder returns. Shareholders are????? Us guys... they own more but are not earning us more.
Clifton Foo
In private sector, the board would have been fired. 10% GST incoming, they gonna recoup losses from their shareholders.
Reply · 14h
Danny Lum
(1) When the net portfolio value rose to S$313 billion from S$308 billion a year ago and Its one-year total shareholder return, however, fell to 1.49 per cent, compared to the 12.19 per cent a year ago ---- it means the capital has grown by investing in longer term investment that will bring higher return over the long run - but lesser return in the 1-year return.
(2) This is not a bad result - as our capital asset grow - and will bring higher return in the long run.
(2) This is not a bad result - as our capital asset grow - and will bring higher return in the long run.
(3) The higher capital grow means that Temasek is able to sell off the asset at a higher price from its original price. And this account for the higher capital asset of S$313 billion.
(4) Despite lower income at 1.49% - it still bring about Dividend income of S$9 billion same as last year when the income return is 12.19%.
This mean our capital asset has grown phenomenally to bring about the absolute return of S$9 billion despite a lower return of 1.49%.
(4) Despite lower income at 1.49% - it still bring about Dividend income of S$9 billion same as last year when the income return is 12.19%.
This mean our capital asset has grown phenomenally to bring about the absolute return of S$9 billion despite a lower return of 1.49%.
Nick Lai
well done, will see brighter future in the yeras ahead
Ishtiaq Ishtiaq
My last month's online earnings was $16953 just by doing very easy and simple job online from home. I am a full time student and doing this online work for 2 to 3 hrs daily online. Awesome job and earning from this are just amazing. Get this today and start making money by follow details here... www.cyberjobsonline.comᴵᴵᴵᴵᴵᴵ
Zen Ten Zenten
This only means one thing ..... more of our reserves are syphoned by Tumasick for them to buy high and sell low.....
Gerrard Villa
So did the director and shareholders declare dividends for themselves? Can cut the salaries of those at the top for causing a deep drop in returns. Something is amiss in the returns? Private sector you get the sack already if returns is below 7%
Tan Alan
Good leadership who are paid $$$ millions should excel at all times; especially in tough n bad times!
1.49% from 12.19% over 12-month period with blatant excuses is GROSS UNDER-PERFORMANCE compared to other sovereignty funds in plain sight, why "spin" as "record high"???
And, $$$ millions compensations are paid to management of Temasek, at what expenses and costs relative to other sovereignty funds?
"$28b Divestments" over "$24b Investments" in turbulent times is a sign of massive FEAR N DESPERATION?
And, with CONVOLUTED SCHEMES/SCAMS to lock-up, "lee-ch" and "milk" on our CPF, important questions need to be asked :-…See More
1.49% from 12.19% over 12-month period with blatant excuses is GROSS UNDER-PERFORMANCE compared to other sovereignty funds in plain sight, why "spin" as "record high"???
And, $$$ millions compensations are paid to management of Temasek, at what expenses and costs relative to other sovereignty funds?
"$28b Divestments" over "$24b Investments" in turbulent times is a sign of massive FEAR N DESPERATION?
And, with CONVOLUTED SCHEMES/SCAMS to lock-up, "lee-ch" and "milk" on our CPF, important questions need to be asked :-…See More
Niko Nishi
To put this number is perspective, this portfolio value is about 30% of Singapore reserves and is also roughly the amount Greece received in its eight years of bailout programs to save its sinking economies in 2010. A small country without a strong reserve can easily end up like Greece, bankrupt.
No comments:
Post a Comment