Not if but when 377A will be repealed, says Singapore movement against anti-gay law
Leaders of the “Ready4Repeal” petition are urging gay and straight people alike to speak up and encourage MPs to support their cause.
(Updated: )
Ricky Lim
Maybe one way to resolve this 377A dispute once and for all - is for the coming General Election - other than voting for the MP to represent our ward, voters are also ask to vote whether to support keeping or repealing this 377A.
In other words, voters will get 2 voting sheet :-
(1) 1st voting sheet - to vote for which MP we want
(2) 2nd voting sheet - to vote to keep or repeal 377A
This will deal with this issue once and for all - and also will not need to spend additional cost and wasting taxpayers' money to hold a referendum on this trivial but highly emotionally charge issue that keep bugging the people.
The number of vote cast to keep or repeal - will be based on the simple majority vote ie. 50.1% and above votes will determine the winner.
In other words, voters will get 2 voting sheet :-
(1) 1st voting sheet - to vote for which MP we want
(2) 2nd voting sheet - to vote to keep or repeal 377A
This will deal with this issue once and for all - and also will not need to spend additional cost and wasting taxpayers' money to hold a referendum on this trivial but highly emotionally charge issue that keep bugging the people.
The number of vote cast to keep or repeal - will be based on the simple majority vote ie. 50.1% and above votes will determine the winner.
LikeReply1mEdited
Ricky Lim
By the way I don't believe non-sectarian Buddhist Fellowship stance - is representing the Singapore Buddhist Federation stance who is representing the entire Buddhist Community in Singapore.
So don't assume the Buddhist is supporting repealing the 377A.
So don't assume the Buddhist is supporting repealing the 377A.
LikeReply1mEdited
Eddie Ong
Ricky Lim that's right.
LikeReply2m
Alvin Leong
Sorry, these people, if they don't get the answer that they want, will keep making more noise until the question gets asked again and again. Just look at the remoaners in the Brexit vote.
Reply6h
Ricky Lim
Alvin Leong - I have sympathy for this group of people.
But there must be a sense of what is morally right and wrong.
This is my view on Section 377A :-
Ricky Lim
Guess Singapore should see Section 377A with 2 lens :-
(1) Explicit lens
(2) Implicit lens
Explicit lens - is to keep Section 377A - to give a sense of what is morally right - Nature that provide for creation of humans is through sexual union of a male and a female to produce offsprings and sustain the human civilisation.
Implicit lens - is to recognise that certain people suffered from illness and cannot behave like normal humans of a man or a woman to engage in normal sexual activity for the reproduction of offsprings.
And thus should not enforce Section 377A on them if they carried out their activity quietly in private.
Like · Reply · 1m
Ricky Lim
(1) The Explicit lens (is the Wisdom lens) - to prevent the invocation of Universal Law of Karma - to instill what is morally, nature right.
(2) The Implicit lens (is the Compassion lens) - to sympathise with the illness that some man and women inherit - and not prosecute them for which they have no control of.
But if treatment has become available, help must be granted to coax them to get treatment to heal the deviant tendency and get well
Like · Reply · 1m
Ricky Lim
(1) The Explicit lens - will deter normal human of man and woman from committing abnormal sexual activities.
This will prevent heterosexual male and female from experimenting homosexual and lesbian activities - moving into deviant anti-nature behavior.
This will be in line with other sexual deviant behavior - by preventing moral decadence that go against Nature.
(2) The Implicit lens - certify that certain individual man and woman indeed has illness in sexual orientation by medical profession.
Regular treatment is also implied to help such individual in mental and physical healing - that hopefully one day, they will be able to get well.
Like · Reply · 1m
But there must be a sense of what is morally right and wrong.
This is my view on Section 377A :-
Ricky Lim
Guess Singapore should see Section 377A with 2 lens :-
(1) Explicit lens
(2) Implicit lens
Explicit lens - is to keep Section 377A - to give a sense of what is morally right - Nature that provide for creation of humans is through sexual union of a male and a female to produce offsprings and sustain the human civilisation.
Implicit lens - is to recognise that certain people suffered from illness and cannot behave like normal humans of a man or a woman to engage in normal sexual activity for the reproduction of offsprings.
And thus should not enforce Section 377A on them if they carried out their activity quietly in private.
Like · Reply · 1m
Ricky Lim
(1) The Explicit lens (is the Wisdom lens) - to prevent the invocation of Universal Law of Karma - to instill what is morally, nature right.
(2) The Implicit lens (is the Compassion lens) - to sympathise with the illness that some man and women inherit - and not prosecute them for which they have no control of.
But if treatment has become available, help must be granted to coax them to get treatment to heal the deviant tendency and get well
Like · Reply · 1m
Ricky Lim
(1) The Explicit lens - will deter normal human of man and woman from committing abnormal sexual activities.
This will prevent heterosexual male and female from experimenting homosexual and lesbian activities - moving into deviant anti-nature behavior.
This will be in line with other sexual deviant behavior - by preventing moral decadence that go against Nature.
(2) The Implicit lens - certify that certain individual man and woman indeed has illness in sexual orientation by medical profession.
Regular treatment is also implied to help such individual in mental and physical healing - that hopefully one day, they will be able to get well.
Like · Reply · 1m
No comments:
Post a Comment