Sunday, March 4, 2018

Looming GST hike a 'prudent and responsible long-term approach': PM Lee
Read more at https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore/looming-gst-hike-a-prudent-and-responsible-long-term-approach-pm-10012092

 (Updated: )

Terence Charles Darby
I do not know the amount of our national reserves. Why should I believe what he says.
LikeReply43h
Valen Chen Tany
The greatest irony of our reserves issue runs contrary to the intrinsic purpose of saving when the savers can't use it even in times of need. The next question would be why are we saving for and for who are the saving for? If the benefits are for our children and grandchildren then does it means that they will be paying less taxes in the future and that their future will be secured with the reserves we are accumulating now? I guess the needy elderly today will never live to know. I remember that the definition of yore for rainy days was 6 months our national GDP so now the goalpost has again been shifted and how are we to know that it won't be shifted again in the future time of our grandchildren? These constant flippings and floppings will do little to improve the crucial trust issue between the govt and its citizens.
LikeReply93h
James Liew
“Our children are not yet voting, our grandchildren may not yet be born, but their lives and future depend on us acting on their behalf, making wise and far-sighted decisions that protect their interests,”

So you are saying our children and their children would be unable to sustain their own livelihood if we do not act now? That if we do not build up our reserves our children and their children will suffer in future? So is the future government going to share our reserves, distribute the country's wealth with my children and their children? Or again, and again, saving up for their children and their children's children????? ENDLESS! Just get lost lah. Go! Go disappear into thin air! Had enough of all this bull!
LikeReply13h
Dave · 
Big mistake, going into the fray of Sylvia Lim who had rightly pointed out such unscrupulous bleeding of poor folks buying necessities n get taxed double or triple may b in time to come ? Poor PM advisor. Should have asked LHL to stay clear of this goofs brought by heng n shanmugam. To fund these projects, u need temasek to set aside Investments of constant returns now that Sg has billions to boast s reserves from investments. By squeezing blood from the shrinking younger population to fund the old effortlessly by the government is wishful thinking. Or is it a clear failure of the CPF system ?...See More
LikeReply13h
Dave · 
Call this approach from first world countries ?
LikeReply12h
ビンオマール宗作
Very roundabout logic. Telling the elderly that the future generations need their money. Telling the current working generation the elderly needs their money. They forced casinos in in the pretext of needing the revenue despite misgivings from Singaporeans few years ago. Wonder how the money they got from that was spent.
LikeReply2h
Peter Lim · 
If the middle and low income earners can't even make ends meet and are currently struggling with daily expenses, what makes you think they are going to care about their children or even their grandchildren? Don't bullshit la Pinky, it's not for our children, it's for you and your cronies children and grandchildren! Show us the account of our reserves then we talk ok?
LikeReply9m

Ricky Lim · 
Posted on :- 01 Mar 2018

Ricky Lim ·
Singapore
“We deliberately introduced rules on land sales and the 50 per cent NIRC cap so that we do not succumb to the temptation to draw more from our reserves to fund current expenditure or eat into the principal sum,” he said.
--

50% of reserve income save and 50% of reserve income spend --- will be the best formula --- as it used half for current spending and plough back half to earn more income.

If this formula is tamper with - Singapore will be in for trouble.

For eg. now say use 60% for spending and save 40% - so less income will be generated as more will be spent.

Another few years down the road, someone will say, let us use more 70% for spending, and save 30%.

Then another few years down the road, someone say let use 90% and save 10%.

And finally one day, someone say, let use all 100% for spending and save 0%.

This is moving away from Middle Path - and will spell trouble for Singapore.

So keep this 50-50 formula is the best formula - as it induced prudent spending of 50% and prudent saving of 50%.
Like · Reply · 1m

Ricky Lim · Singapore
So when income from reserve is used up now, and the principal does not grow ---- in future when more spendings is required, how to tap the principal reserve income when its income cannot grow ---- then got to tax the taxpayers more ----- and it come back to the square one.

And worst still, Singapore will have no more buffer to cushion the Economy and the people - when our reserves did not grow to earn more income - when we used up all our buffers --- and Singapore is sure to get into big trouble.

Thus keeping the formula 50-50 - save half, spend half - 中道 Middle Path is the sacred, divine formula - and must not be tamper with.
Like · Reply · 1m · Edited
LikeReply1m

No comments:

Post a Comment