38 Oxley Road dispute: Lee Wei Ling again questions PM Lee’s account, quotes email from Janadas Devan
Read more at http://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore/38-oxley-road-dispute-lee-wei-ling-again-questions-pm-lee-s-8991570
Read more at http://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore/38-oxley-road-dispute-lee-wei-ling-again-questions-pm-lee-s-8991570
(Updated: )
|
Ricky Lim ·
Mr
Devan added: “In the meantime, I am as baffled as most Singaporeans why
(your brother) Hsien Yang and you wish to consume all of us in your
personal family matters. Please: Think of Singapore, and forget the
rest.”
----
Mr Devan is right.
Both LHY and LWL - did not think of Singapore.
----
Mr Devan is right.
Both LHY and LWL - did not think of Singapore.
Like · Reply · Just now
Ricky Lim ·
Mr
Lee Kuan Yew initially is unwavering in wanting to demolish Oxley House
- because he is afraid that Singaporeans may confuse :-
"Heritage" with "Legacy".
This is supported by the siblings' statement:-
They outlined their father’s wish for the house to be demolished immediately after his death, and alleged that PM Lee wanted to preserve the house “to inherit (Lee Kuan Yew’s) credibility”
But look at it this way :-
By separating the entity of "Heritage as legacy" ---- but construe it as :-
"Heritage" to reinforce Mr Lee Kuan Yew's "Ideals - ideals of Meritocracy" - which is the essential for Singapore's birth, survival and continuing prosperity ---- will have break Mr Lee Kuan Yew's fear of "Heritage" as "Legacy".
When this is done - there is no more justification and basis to demolish Oxley House - for fear of "Heritage" as "Legacy" that benefit self --- but as "Heritage" as foundation to reinforce "Ideals - ideals of Meritocracy" that will ensure Singapore's birth, survival and continuing prosperity - for the sake of Modern Singapore, all Singaporeans and future descendants.
Now from "fearful of attachment to self" --- to a wholesome, holistic ideal - for the future of "Singapore".
Will this be a good enough reasoning and justification to preserve Oxley House as oppose to demolish it?
Buddha say "Don't just listen to every words I say as gospel truth. Examine what I say, what I do critically and use your judgement to decide whether it is worth your while to follow my discourse.
Don't follow in blind faith simply because I say so."
Now the same statement should apply to both Mr LHY and Ms LWL :-
"Don't just worship your Father's wish as "Gospel Truth" and worship it like God or Imperial Decreee in blind faith".
"Listen to Sound Reasonings and Worship Sound Judgement that benefit the larger good of Singapore, all Singaporeans and future descendants".
So will Mr Lee HY and Ms LWL - for the sake of Singapore, all Singaporeans and Future Descendants - consider not to demolish Oxley House --- where the pretext is "Heritage" as foundation to reinforce "Ideals of Meritocracy"?
"Heritage" with "Legacy".
This is supported by the siblings' statement:-
They outlined their father’s wish for the house to be demolished immediately after his death, and alleged that PM Lee wanted to preserve the house “to inherit (Lee Kuan Yew’s) credibility”
But look at it this way :-
By separating the entity of "Heritage as legacy" ---- but construe it as :-
"Heritage" to reinforce Mr Lee Kuan Yew's "Ideals - ideals of Meritocracy" - which is the essential for Singapore's birth, survival and continuing prosperity ---- will have break Mr Lee Kuan Yew's fear of "Heritage" as "Legacy".
When this is done - there is no more justification and basis to demolish Oxley House - for fear of "Heritage" as "Legacy" that benefit self --- but as "Heritage" as foundation to reinforce "Ideals - ideals of Meritocracy" that will ensure Singapore's birth, survival and continuing prosperity - for the sake of Modern Singapore, all Singaporeans and future descendants.
Now from "fearful of attachment to self" --- to a wholesome, holistic ideal - for the future of "Singapore".
Will this be a good enough reasoning and justification to preserve Oxley House as oppose to demolish it?
Buddha say "Don't just listen to every words I say as gospel truth. Examine what I say, what I do critically and use your judgement to decide whether it is worth your while to follow my discourse.
Don't follow in blind faith simply because I say so."
Now the same statement should apply to both Mr LHY and Ms LWL :-
"Don't just worship your Father's wish as "Gospel Truth" and worship it like God or Imperial Decreee in blind faith".
"Listen to Sound Reasonings and Worship Sound Judgement that benefit the larger good of Singapore, all Singaporeans and future descendants".
So will Mr Lee HY and Ms LWL - for the sake of Singapore, all Singaporeans and Future Descendants - consider not to demolish Oxley House --- where the pretext is "Heritage" as foundation to reinforce "Ideals of Meritocracy"?
Like · Reply · Just now
James Tan ·
It
is precisely because the siblings think of S'pore's future that they
are doing what they are doing now. Whether they are right or wrong, only
a COI consisting of neutral and reputable people should be conveyed to
reveal the truth.
Ricky Lim ·
James
Tan - are you saying that Member of Parliaments - democratically
elected by People - and that are running our Country not good enough?
NCMP and NMP of good man not good enough?
must appoint COI of good man is it?
Then people will ask - on what basis the members of COI selected is good enough to look at the siblings allegations?
Where is the end?
NCMP and NMP of good man not good enough?
must appoint COI of good man is it?
Then people will ask - on what basis the members of COI selected is good enough to look at the siblings allegations?
Where is the end?
Like · Reply · 8 mins
Ricky Lim ·
James
Tan - if MPs, NCMPs, NMPs --- some are ruling, some are opposition,
some are independents - representatives of Singaporeans who
democratically elected are not good enough -- are not impartial enough
to examine the siblings allegations ---- then how are you going to be
convinced that appointed COI members will convince you or the siblings?
And in this virtue, if you don't believe the above are impartial -- if this case is brought to Court --- will "contempt of Court" come into play --- by saying Judges are also appointed by the Government.
Then Where is the end? what else will make people convince? -- just to please this 2 siblings.
And in this virtue, if you don't believe the above are impartial -- if this case is brought to Court --- will "contempt of Court" come into play --- by saying Judges are also appointed by the Government.
Then Where is the end? what else will make people convince? -- just to please this 2 siblings.
Like · Reply · Just now
Ricky Lim ·
And I believe if Mr Lee Kuan Yew rise from his grave today and listen to the argument of :-
"Heritage" not = "Legacy"
but
"Heritage" = "Reminder as Ideals for Meritocracy"
--- will have change his mind - from "demolish" to "Preserve" Oxley House.
"Heritage" not = "Legacy"
but
"Heritage" = "Reminder as Ideals for Meritocracy"
--- will have change his mind - from "demolish" to "Preserve" Oxley House.
Like · Reply · Just now
Ricky Lim ·
And these son and daughter stubborness and the way they waylaid their elder brother will make Mr Lee Kuan Yew heartbroken.
Because Mr Lee Kuan Yew did waver and is changing his mind in quite a number of successive wills - by removing the clause of "demolition" --- but in dubious circumstance re-insert into the 7th and last Will - not drafted by the originial 1st to 6th Lee&Lee lawyers.
Because Mr Lee Kuan Yew did waver and is changing his mind in quite a number of successive wills - by removing the clause of "demolition" --- but in dubious circumstance re-insert into the 7th and last Will - not drafted by the originial 1st to 6th Lee&Lee lawyers.
No comments:
Post a Comment