Rise in insecure work means universal basic income needed more than ever, Government told
Jon Stone
ricky l
The idea of Universal Basic Income - come from me !
Posted in :- Saturday, July 5, 2014
Avatar
ricky l 0 seconds ago
If nuclear is the technology that will wipe out mankind in World War 3.
The turning point of Capitalism will wipe out jobs globally - that mirror nuclear destruction of human mankind in World War 3.
Posted in :- Saturday, July 5, 2014
Avatar
ricky l 0 seconds ago
If nuclear is the technology that will wipe out mankind in World War 3.
The turning point of Capitalism will wipe out jobs globally - that mirror nuclear destruction of human mankind in World War 3.
In other words, United Nation need to solve this Capitalism Model (Market Economy Model) - how to create jobs to feed every citizens in each Country given the advent of disruptive technologies and robotics that destroy jobs.
How to redistribute wealth to all citizens in each Country.
How to redistribute wealth to all citizens in each Country.
A hint is that disruptive technologies and robotics - can be a slave to human mankind - to allocate a fixed subsistence sum of income to every human being for food, housing, medical, education, transport etc. - Planned Economy
Then the other part of the income is through job - for luxury. - Capitalism
Then the other part of the income is through job - for luxury. - Capitalism
ricky l
The idea of Universal Basic Income is very simple.
Assuming in a Country of 500 million people, 1,000 boss create 1000 factory make up of robots and disruptive tech and automation - and employ 0 workers - and produce everything an Economy needs - phone, computer, food, doctor, lawyer, bankers etc.
Then only 1000 boss has income and 499,999,999,000 people in the Country is unemployed.
In this analogy, 1000 boss produced everything but no one has income to buy - except the 1000 boss.
Do you think the Economy will die?
Do you think the 499,999,999,000 people will snatch everything the 1000 boss produce - or else go hungry?
Hence you need to give 499,999,999,000 people income - "Basic Universal Income" produced by robotics - and make robot the slave to human - and not human become slave to robots ---- if one day, robots take over the jobs of all humans.
Assuming in a Country of 500 million people, 1,000 boss create 1000 factory make up of robots and disruptive tech and automation - and employ 0 workers - and produce everything an Economy needs - phone, computer, food, doctor, lawyer, bankers etc.
Then only 1000 boss has income and 499,999,999,000 people in the Country is unemployed.
In this analogy, 1000 boss produced everything but no one has income to buy - except the 1000 boss.
Do you think the Economy will die?
Do you think the 499,999,999,000 people will snatch everything the 1000 boss produce - or else go hungry?
Hence you need to give 499,999,999,000 people income - "Basic Universal Income" produced by robotics - and make robot the slave to human - and not human become slave to robots ---- if one day, robots take over the jobs of all humans.
ricky l
When the 499,999,999,000 people have income from "Basic Universal Income" - then they can start to buy products and services from the goods and services produced by the robotics of the 1000 boss.
Then and only then the Economy will grow - and Economy will not die.
The "Basic Universal Income" is like a normal people working to bring in income - but this time, robots take over the human to bring in income for humans - since robots replace humans' jobs.
Robots hence become the slave of humans ---- and not humans become slave and lose jobs to robots.
The 1000 boss also happy - because now got 499,999,999,000 people buy their products and services - and not snatch away their wealth produce by robots.
Then and only then the Economy will grow - and Economy will not die.
The "Basic Universal Income" is like a normal people working to bring in income - but this time, robots take over the human to bring in income for humans - since robots replace humans' jobs.
Robots hence become the slave of humans ---- and not humans become slave and lose jobs to robots.
The 1000 boss also happy - because now got 499,999,999,000 people buy their products and services - and not snatch away their wealth produce by robots.
Rise in insecure work means universal basic income needed more than ever, Government told
Jon Stone
The Government should respond to the increasing proliferation of insecure “zero-hours” contracts by piloting a universal basic income, the Green Party has said.
New figures based on an analysis of ONS data reveal that 105,000 more people are in the insecure jobs compared to last year, up 14 per cent year-on-year and 30 per cent higher than 2014. In 2005 there were just 100,000 people recorded as being on such contracts.
The Resolution Foundation, which conducted the research, said the rate of increase of the contracts appeared to have slowed in the last half of 2016. This coincided with campaigns against insecure work bearing fruit and major employers switching to contracts with stable hours.
Jonathan Bartley, the Green party’s co-leader, said the economy was clearly entering a “new age of insecurity” and that radical policies were needed to address it.
The Greens have long advocated a flat unconditional payment or “basic income” to all citizens; an idea which has since gained traction elsewhere.
“An economy that works for all does not look like this,” Mr Bartley said. “The gig economy can provide flexibility but without proper protection for workers we are entering a new age of insecurity.
“The rate at which zero hours contracts are spreading may have slowed but the top line figure is at a record high and the fight to ensure everyone has a secure job they can build a life is more important than ever.
“The economy and work itself are rapidly changing, and new technologies mean the workspace of the future does not look like that of the past. We need to keep up, and we need bold ideas to tackle the insecurity of the 21st century and the new economy.
“The Government should follow Finland’s lead and pilot a Basic Income - a regular, non-means tested payment made to everyone. This would provide people with real security to pursue meaningful employment, reward unpaid work and look to the future - not the past.”
Countries and municipalities including Finland, and the Dutch city of Utrecht are conducting trials of basic incomes, but the British Government has been resistant to the idea.
Last year ministers at the DWP rejected the idea of a universal basic income as “unaffordable”.
“Universal Credit is the right system for the United Kingdom,” Damian Hinds told a parliamentary debate at the time.
“This is a responsible government that implemented a system that encourages work, supports the most vulnerable and is affordable.”
Labour’s shadow chancellor John McDonnell has suggested Labour could look at the idea of piloting the policy, though he has yet to make any firm commitment.