(1) I come across people who proclaim themselves to be opposition - normally will speak loudly or voice their views loudly during a session and will always challenge, voice opposition and refuse to listen to reasoning at the expense of other residents - normally chair by the Government.
(2) Eg. in an improvement programme chair by a Govt body - one chap identify himself as an opposition member is seen criticising the way the programme is organised to a civil servant - while the rest of the resident listen to what he say
a. After listening for a while, the residents start to get restless and not listening to him - because what he say does not reasonate with many of the residents, the reasons sound unreasonable.
b. When the civil servant after explaining to him for quite awhile, the civil servant walk off - and this man then turn around and start talking loudly to those around him and even turn backward to talk to some aunties and uncles.
c. Some aunties and uncles start to question his reasonings - and soon he discover that many people just walk away - and no one sit around him --- and he look very sheepish.
d. When his turn come to register his vote --- he start his reasoning all over again to another civil servant --- eventually he did not register --- and wasted half and hour of the civil servant's time and other people on the queue.
(3) In another online forum, a female start to attack all the known Government politicians - criticising practically many Government policies --- and many of her complaints sound foolish and stupid.
a. Eventually, many in the online forum request the administrator to kick this female out of the forum - because she is disruptive, unreasonable and most of what she say sound foolish.
b. She was kick out of the online forum by the administrator - and the forum become more fruitful and constructive.
4. Thinking aloud --- such Opposition quality if stand for election ---- are doom to fail ---- as they lack substance and quality --- but only good at opposing for the sake of opposing --- and many residents sounds wiser and more knowledgeable than these type of oppositions - and if elected - Singapore will be doomed.
1 second ago
(1) The Government already put aside $600 to trade-in exchange for a bicycle - where a bicycle can cycle on a foodpath - without going on the road and will not cause accidents on the road and less dangerous to pedestrains.
(2) Some food delivery can go by foot - no need a PMD to do food delivery.
(3) So don't understand what the fuss this opposition trying to made.
1 hour ago
You yourself choose it to be a closed door session and now the public cannot verified whether you are telling the truth or starts to finger pointing?
1 hour ago
If the pap compliant media want's us to believe everything it's told to report,release the video of whoever came to "politicise the issue and stoke the emotions of those present".Singaporeans can then judge if that opposition politician was indeed "behaving aggressively and shouting" and whether "such actions are irresponsible and abhorrent" or not.
1 hour ago
Lam Pah
1 hour ago
Watch the 2 minute video of Goh at Chee hong tat meeting in Toa payoh with pmd riders on mothership sg.Where he appeared to be very rational and asked pertinent questions followed by applause by the pmd riders.
2 hours ago
Snowflake minister who first created the mess and now doesn't want anyone to disturb his tranquility while he fumbles around for a non-solution.
All of Lam's solutions have failed, yet he has the temerity to outright reject one which he has not tried yet (licensing). Can he point to the data to prove why it is "of no use"? Or it is "of no use" purely because it wasn't a PAP idea? Hard evidence has shown that in fact, it is PAP's ideas that are "of no use"!
2 hours ago
Papies only used to obedient well & vaccinated audience.... Truth is the playing field is more ROBUST now.
By justalittletumblweed on
2 hours ago
This is just a trailer full movie will be OSCAR
award winner.
By giantmonster on
2 hours ago
PAP always like to play the BLAMING GAME but never admit their own INCOMPETENCE. GOH SONG MENG is just a COMMONER.
1 hour ago
just solve the problems you have created, stop politicising too!
53 minutes ago
(1) Just because he is opposition doesn't make him less a concerned citizen. (2) Just because he spoke out; out of frustrations like many citizens does not make him "irresponsible and abhorrent". Was he wrong to ask a question or does PAP want AGC to make him issue an apology again?
(2) Eg. in an improvement programme chair by a Govt body - one chap identify himself as an opposition member is seen criticising the way the programme is organised to a civil servant - while the rest of the resident listen to what he say
a. After listening for a while, the residents start to get restless and not listening to him - because what he say does not reasonate with many of the residents, the reasons sound unreasonable.
b. When the civil servant after explaining to him for quite awhile, the civil servant walk off - and this man then turn around and start talking loudly to those around him and even turn backward to talk to some aunties and uncles.
c. Some aunties and uncles start to question his reasonings - and soon he discover that many people just walk away - and no one sit around him --- and he look very sheepish.
d. When his turn come to register his vote --- he start his reasoning all over again to another civil servant --- eventually he did not register --- and wasted half and hour of the civil servant's time and other people on the queue.
(3) In another online forum, a female start to attack all the known Government politicians - criticising practically many Government policies --- and many of her complaints sound foolish and stupid.
a. Eventually, many in the online forum request the administrator to kick this female out of the forum - because she is disruptive, unreasonable and most of what she say sound foolish.
b. She was kick out of the online forum by the administrator - and the forum become more fruitful and constructive.
4. Thinking aloud --- such Opposition quality if stand for election ---- are doom to fail ---- as they lack substance and quality --- but only good at opposing for the sake of opposing --- and many residents sounds wiser and more knowledgeable than these type of oppositions - and if elected - Singapore will be doomed.
(2) Some food delivery can go by foot - no need a PMD to do food delivery.
(3) So don't understand what the fuss this opposition trying to made.
All of Lam's solutions have failed, yet he has the temerity to outright reject one which he has not tried yet (licensing). Can he point to the data to prove why it is "of no use"? Or it is "of no use" purely because it wasn't a PAP idea? Hard evidence has shown that in fact, it is PAP's ideas that are "of no use"!
award winner.