DPM Heng Swee Keat asks WP MPs to recuse themselves from AHTC's financial matters
21 seconds ago
- 1 second ago(1) A deliberate attempt to hide the "collusion" to award the tender to his contractor - instead of based on objective award criteria - is a form of dishonesty.
(2) Whereas in other audit lapse - no dishonesty is involved --- is totally a different matter. - PAP Town Councils had gambled away funds in risky investments and the loss amounted in tens of millions. Yet to date,no one was taken to task to recoup the funds for use for the benefit of the constituencies and the residents !
- “Allowing your friends to help themselves to public funds - that is a tale that belongs to the Third World, not Singapore"
Is HSK referring to the unelected guy in Aljunied ward who helped himself to public funds? - " “Will the Workers’ Party provide the House with any guarantees to uphold accountability and transparency between now and the appeal?”
Your party hasn't answer this question for decades and you hv the cheek to ask this on a non-ruling, relatively inconsequential oppo party. - I empathized and sympathized them and trust them because they have no power. On the contrary, a non elected candidate being appointed as a adviser and was so powerful and overruled the elected MP. An elected MP has to seek his approval.
- So should the health minister, who made an unforgivable mistake, resign?
- Recuse? Isn't that the word Loong used regarding the Oxley house matter? Then he got Teo to form a ministerial committee to explore "alternate" developments of the site - in clear defiant of LKY's wish & will. Then he hijacked parliament for 2 days to hold wayang kangaroo court. More like kettle calling pot black, hor.
The duo, who were held accountable for improper payments made by the AHTC, aim to challenge the High Court's decision in the civil case brought against them by the town council.
--
(1) This is an irresponsible statement.
(2) I am sure they will pay a price for it - in the coming General Election.