1. To prevent the 2 SuperPowers engage in full-frontal confrontation that can lead to military conflict and trigger World War 3 ------ there is a need to do some soul-searching by both SuperPowers.

2. The best solution is for both SuperPower - to address their own inadequacies of their system of Governance - and patch it up to make their system better ---- so that others will buy their points that their system is indeed better - and others will respect them and even want to emulate and follow their system of Governance.

3. Winning others over - cannot be by using their might and power over others ---- but by winning over others' "Heart and Mind" ---- then it will be more lasting and durable.

4. And the outcome will be Peace and Prosperity ---- not what the World is experiencing and encountering now ---- bickering, political jostling, sanction, mutual sabotaging - that destablise the whole World system, supply chain, trade, investment, travel, social visit and overseas education.

5. Hence there is a need for the 2 SuperPowers to relook at the attached issues and come out with solutions to patch up the inadequacies of their respective System --- before "selling their system" to another and before criticisng other system.

Google Translate

1.为了防止这两个超级大国进行全面的对抗，这可能导致军事冲突并引发第三次世界大战------有必要对两个超级大国进行深入的思考。

2.最好的解决方案是，超级大国（SuperPower）-解决他们自己的治理系统的不足-并对其进行修补以使他们的系统更好-以便其他人会认为他们的系统确实更好-和其他人会尊重他们，甚至想效仿并遵循他们的治理体系。

3.战胜他人-不能通过利用自己的力量和力量来战胜他人，而是通过战胜他人的“心灵”，这将更加持久和持久。

4.结果将是和平与繁荣-而不是世界正在经历和遇到的一切-争吵，政治争吵，制裁，相互破坏-这破坏了整个世界体系，供应链，贸易，投资的稳定，旅行，社交访问和海外教育。

5.因此，这两个超级大国有必要重新审视所附的问题，并提出解决方案，以弥补各自系统的不足-在“出售其系统”之前，以及在批评其他系统之前。

--------

Now i try to compose - what I can do better if I govern China to make China strong and respectable. And what I can do if I govern US to make US strong and respectable. To prevent World War 3.

A draft (will take sometimes to craft - how to patch up the inadequacies of the system of the 2 SuperPowers):-

What can China do better, to be strong and respectable.

1. Bring out the best in Socialism - eg. allow political stability, long-term strategic planning for Economic growth and alleviating people out of poverty, redistribution of wealth to enure social equality.

2. Allowing freedom of expression domestically without causing social unrest - but help to promote innovation, creativity, promote goodwill among citizens and with international people.

3. How to promote neighborliness with neighbor Countries - to promote friendship, trade, business, investment, travel, - to secure win-win outcome, mutual respect and gain soft power - as "Power is gained - from the heart and mind" - not physical power.

4. How to engage US the incumbent SuperPower - to compete fairly and to cooperate cordially for mutual benefits and ensure the rest of the World benefited from the engagement. This will win over many Countries - the projection of soft power.

5. How to handle my core interest and handle my internal affairs such as HK, Xinjiang, Taiwan wholesomely - that will be able to bring a good outcome domestically and yet will not invite adverse attention from external Countries.

What can US do better, to be strong and respectable.

1. Bring out the best in Democracy eg. eg. allow political stability, long-term strategic planning for Economic growth and alleviating people out of poverty, redistribution of wealth to enure social equality.

2 Allowing freedom of expression without leading to white nationalism, domestic terrorism, racism but promote promote goodwill among citizens and with international people.

3. How to promote neighborliness with friends, allies, adversaries - to promote friendship, trade, business, investment, travel, - to secure win-win outcome, mutual respect and gain soft power - as "Power is gained - from the heart and mind" - not physical power.

4. How to ensure financial stability and sustainability, economic growth through fiscal balancing, trade, investment, upskilling workers and business transformation as well as working with overseas Countries to promote win-win trade relationship, investment.

5. How to engage China the up and coming SuperPower - to compete fairly and to cooperate cordially for mutual benefits and ensure the rest of the World benefited from the engagement. This will win over many Countries - the projection of soft power.

And 3 Principles & Value System will form the foundation - on how the inadequacies of the system of the 2 SuperPower can be corrected :-

1. Self Interest, Interest of Others (able to emphatise).

2. Wisdom (able to find solutions to safeguard Self-Interest, and at the same time, ensure Interest of Others are not compromise, disregarded and run-over).

3. Compassion (ensure solutions are fair, equitable, just with Humanity at the core).

Google Translate

现在，我尝试写作-如果我统治中国以使中国强大和受人尊敬，我可以做得更好。如果我统治美国以使美国强大和受人尊敬，该怎么办。为了防止第三次世界大战。

草稿（有时需要草拟-如何弥补两个超级大国系统的不足之处）：

中国要成为强大和受人尊敬的国家，可以做得更好。

1.发挥社会主义的精华-例如允许政治稳定，经济增长的长期战略规划，减轻人民的贫困，重新分配财富以确保社会平等。

2.允许国内的言论自由而不引起社会动荡-但有助于促进创新，创造力，促进公民之间以及与国际人民之间的善意。

3.如何促进与邻国的睦邻关系-增进友谊，贸易，商业，投资，旅行，-确保双赢，相互尊重并获得软实力-就像“从心智中获取力量”-不是体力。

4.如何与美国现任超级大国交战-公平竞争并进行真诚合作以谋求互惠互利，并确保世界其他地区受益于交战。这将赢得许多国家的信任-软实力的投射。

5.如何处理我的核心利益并完整地处理我的内政，例如香港，新疆，台湾，这将在国内带来良好的结果，而不会引起外界的不利关注。

美国可以做得更好，变得强大和受人尊敬。

1.发挥出最好的民主例如。允许政治稳定，经济增长的长期战略规划，减轻人民的贫困，重新分配财富以确保社会平等。

2允许言论自由而不会导致白人民族主义，国内恐怖主义，种族主义，但要促进公民之间以及与国际人民之间的善意。

3.如何促进与朋友，盟友和对手的睦邻关系-促进友谊，贸易，商业，投资，旅行，-确保双赢，相互尊重并获得软实力-如“从内心深处获得力量”头脑”-不是体力。

4.如何通过财政平衡，贸易，投资，高技能工人和业务转型以及与海外国家合作促进双赢的贸易关系，投资来确保金融稳定和可持续性，经济增长。

5.如何与新兴的超级大国进行接触-公平竞争并进行真诚合作以实现互惠互利，并确保世界其他地区从参与中受益。这将赢得许多国家的信任-软实力的投射。

3原则和价值体系将构成基础-如何纠正2超级大国体系的不足之处：-

1.自身利益，他人利益（有同理心）。

2.智慧（能够找到解决方案来维护自我兴趣，同时确保他人的利益不受到损害，被忽视和超越）。

3.同情心（确保解决方案公正，公平，以人为本）。

Part 1 - Socialism System vs Democratic System ---

Into a Hybrid System (Democracy in Communism) and (Pre-qualified elected candidate in a Democratic System)

1. Democracy in Communism - Core Leaders are elected by the Party - according to meritocracy, compassion, and ability to bring progress, peace and prosperity to the Country. 

(In future if confidence develop, the Party-elected core leaders --- can open up to the citizens --- whereby Core Leaders sell their governing visions to the citizens --- and citizens can vote whether they support the Party vision or not. If more than 50% is secured - then the Core Leaders will form the Government. Else a new set of core leaders needed to be re-elected by the Party.

This could be a new kind of democracy in Communism --- whereby continuation of Governance, long-term strategic planning, political stability can be ensured.

Universal Sufferage - with the participation of citizens will give legitimacy to the Party --- and will silence external Countries - that Communism is not democratic.

2. Candidates to 2 Parties for Presidential Candidate should be pre-qualified that have characteristics of Competency to Govern, compassion, ability to unite people than divide, no racism, able to work with overseas countries etc - a tweak to Democracy with pre-qualified candidate.

However, in such 2 Parties democratic system - long term strategic planning, political stability, continuation of Governance ---- is difficult to achieve - as different Parties chop and change the Government Policies ---- depending on which Party win the Election ----- and this bring the about adverse outcome of :-

a. Short term policies that are populist to win votes ---- but to the detriment of the long-term National interest of the Country - 

eg. 1 always planning budget deficit and spending, spending, spending --- accumulating mammoth public debt that is impossible to be repaid by future descendants.

eg. 2 not planning strategic competitiveness of industry and business -- left to market forces whereby business will just sell their business for money when become profitable. Thus strategic industry like telecoms, semiconductor, 5G, etc are lost --- because Government fail to do long-term strategic planning.

eg. 3 no long term planning for infrastructure upgrade

eg. 4 no long term planning to invest in education and ensure continuous supply of talents.

eg. 5 financial reserves cannot be depleted

eg. 6. business transformation and workers reskilling, economic policy, fiscal policy, monetary policy --- cannot be changed that is detrimental to the Nation's interest.

To plug this loopholes and inadequacies of such democratic system - whereby Parties may change hands from time to time --- and blunt its competitive edge due to failure to achieve long-term strategic planning, political stability and governance continuation :-

a. 2 Parties must jointly agree on those areas that are deem strategic to the National Interest such as those mention above (including but not limited to) --- and cannot change without the agreement of both Parties.

Thus despite Parties change hand during election ---- long-term planning, and govenance continuation will not change.

This will ensure that National Strategic Interest will not be compromised ---- due to the "Changing political election" --- and ensure long-term strategic planning is possible.

Google Translate

第一部分-社会主义制度与民主制度-

到混合系统（民主共产主义）和（资格预审当选者在民主制度）

1.共产民主-核心领导人由党选出，依据的是精英，同情心和为国家带来进步，和平与繁荣的能力。

（在将来如果发展的信心，党当选的领导核心---可以打开到公民---借此领导核心出售他们的管理愿景的公民---和公民可以投票是否支持党视力或不。如果有50％以上的人得到保证，则核心领导人将组建政府，而另一组新的核心领导人需要由该党连任。

这可能是共产主义中的一种新型民主，即可以确保继续执政，长期战略规划和政治稳定。

普遍苦难-在公民的参与下，将使该党具有合法性-并且将使外部国家保持沉默-共产主义不是民主的。

2.考生2个缔约方总统候选人应该通过资格预审具有竞争力的特性进行治理，同情，团结的人比鸿沟，没有种族主义，能够与海外国家等工作的能力 - 一个调整，以民主与预审合格候选人。

然而，在这种2个缔约方民主制度 - 长期战略规划，政治稳定，治理的延续----是难以实现的 - 为不同的缔约方朝令夕改的政府政策----这取决于党在大选中获胜 - ----并带来以下不良后果：-

一种。以民粹主义赢得选票的短期政策----但是损害了国家的长期国家利益-

例如。 1总是计划预算赤字和支出，支出，支出-积累庞大的公共债务，而这些债务是未来子孙无法偿还的。

例如。 2不规划工商业的战略竞争力-留给市场力量，使企业在获利时将其出售的只是金钱。这样一来，电信，半导体，5G等战略性产业就迷失了，因为政府没有进行长期的战略规划。

例如。 3没有针对基础架构升级的长期计划

例如。 4没有长期计划投资于教育并确保持续提供人才。

例如。 5财务储备不能耗尽

例如。 6.商业变革和工人再技能，经济政策，财政政策，货币政策---不能改变，这不利于国家的利益。

填补这种民主制度的漏洞和不足之处，即各党派可能不时易手，并且由于未能实现长期战略规划，政治稳定和治理延续而钝化其竞争优势：

一种。 2缔约方必须共同商定对国家利益具有战略意义的领域，例如上述提到的那些领域（包括但不限于这些领域），未经双方同意，任何领域都不得改变。

因此，尽管各党派在选举中都做出了决定----长期计划，而且继续选举也不会改变。

这将确保不会因“不断变化的政治选举”而损害国家战略利益，并确保长期战略规划成为可能。

Part 2 - Securing the core interest and sovereignty - by tweaking the system of governance into a Hybrid System (Democracy in Communism) - moving Communism into a middle ground.

1. Central Core Leadeers are elected by the Communist Party - based on meritocracy, competency to govern, compassion - that can bring Peace, Unity, Prosperity and Progress to the Country as well as able to strike a good relationship with the World.

2. Provinical Core Leader from the Communist Party are elected by the Pary Leaders - based on the ability to unite the Provincial residents to support the Party core values and patriotism to the Country and the Party, able to upgrade the living standards, well-beings, housing, education, jobs of the people in the province.

3. Conduct Universal Suffrage of Central Core Leaders (as the Core Leaders share their governance vision) - to be elected by the citizens nationwide (from all the provinces). 50% votes will past the post and the Core Leaders will be elected as the Central Governmnemt. 

If below 50%, another set of Core Leaders from the Communist Party will be put forward for citizen votes.

(Note:- even though if some provinces may be below 50% of votes, other provinces may have high percentage of votes --- and Central Core Leaders are elected by Nationwide total votes).

4. Conduct Provincial election of Provincial Core Leaders - and similarly with 50% votes win the Provincial Government.

If below 50%, another set of Provincial Core Leaders elected by the Central Core Leaders will be put forward for citizen votes.

5. Under such democratic process in Communism system - the Communist Party remain the Government to ensure continuation of leadership, long-term planning, political stability --- as Central Core Leaders and Provincial Core Leaders --- come from the Communist Party.

And the best is - they gain legitimacy (domestically and internationally) - because the citizens vote in a democratic process to elect their Govrnment. And inddeed a Universal Suffrage.

6. How will this tweak to system of Governance resolve the painful problem that attract undue attention from the West in the governance of Xingjiang, Tibet and HK?

a. Citizens of these provinces take part in the nationwide election and votes for the Central Core Leaders.

b. Citizens of these provinces vote for the Provinical Core Leaders that are elected by the Communist Party.

The Provinical Core Leaders could be from their respective Province community that are Communist Party members respected by the citizens. These Provincial Core Leaders will be loyal to both the Communist Party, the Country and love their community - in order to win the provincial election.

c. So these will have resolved the issues of criticism by the West - of autocratic government in governing Xinjiang, Tibet and HK.

d. What happen if the 1st set of provincial leaders fall below 50% and the 2nd set of provincial leaders fall below 50% (in problematic provinces like Xinjiang, Tibet and HK)?

Simple - the highest of the 2 set of votes become the Provincial Core Leaders.

Xinjiang, Tibet and HK problem solve!

7. Now, how to solve Taiwan issue with this Hybrid system of Governance --- Taiwan provincial leaders must first join the Communist Party of China and have the above core values.

a. Eg. KMT provincial leaders and DPP provincial leaders elected by the Communist Party are put to votes to Taiwan citizens.

Taiwan sovereingty problem solve! (No need to invade Taiwan, 手足互杀, China-US fight war).

Google Translate

第2部分-确保核心利益和主权-通过将治理系统调整为混合系统（共产主义民主）-将共产主义置于中间立场。

1.中央核心领导人由共产党选举产生，这是基于精英，统治能力，同情心的，它可以为该国带来和平，统一，繁荣与进步，并能够与世界建立良好的关系。

2.共产党的省级核心领导人由党的领袖选举产生-基于团结各省居民支持党的核心价值观和爱国主义对国家和党的能力，能够提高人民的生活水平和福祉，住房，教育，该省人民的工作。

3.进行中央核心领导人的普选（因为核心领导人具有共同的治理远见）-由全国公民（来自所有省份）选举产生。 50％的选票将通过岗位和领导核心将当选为中央Governmnemt。

如果低于50％，将提出另一组来自共产党的核心领导人进行公民投票。

（请注意：-即使某些省份的选票可能低于50％，其他省份的选票也可能会占较高比例-而中央核心领导人是由全国总票数选举产生的）。

4.进行省级核心领导人的省级选举-同样，以50％的选票赢得省级政府。

如果低于50％，将提出由中央核心领导人选出的另一组省级核心领导人进行公民投票。

5.在共产主义制度的这种民主进程下，共产党仍然是政府，以确保继续领导，长期计划，政治稳定（中央核心领导人和省级核心领导人）来自共产党。

最好的是-他们（在国内和国际上）获得合法性-因为公民在民主进程中投票选举他们的政府。并实现了普选权。

6.对治理体系的这种调整将如何解决在西方国家对新疆，西藏和香港的治理中引起西方过度关注的痛苦问题？

一种。这些省的公民参加全国大选，并投票选举中央核心领导人。

b。这些省的公民投票选举共产党选出的Provinical核心领导人。

Provinical核心领导人可能来自其各自的省社区，这些社区是受到公民尊敬的共产党员。这些省级核心领导人将忠于共产党，国家并热爱他们的社区-以赢得省级选举。

C。因此，这些将解决西方对新疆，西藏和香港的专制政府的批评问题。

d。如果第一批省级领导人降到50％以下，第二组省级领导人降到50％以下（在有问题的省份，如新疆，西藏和香港），会发生什么？

简单-两张选票中的最高者成为省级核心领导人。

新疆，西藏，香港问题解决！

7.现在，如何用这种混合管理体制解决台湾问题---台湾省级领导人必须首先加入中国共产党，并具有上述核心价值。

一种。例如。共产党选举产生的国民党各省领导人和民进党各省领导人对台湾公民进行投票。

解决台湾主权问题！ （无需入侵台湾，手足互杀，中美战争）。

======

If countries take sides, then world war 3 will break up - because of irreconcilable differences between 2 blocs.

This is what happens to world war 1 and 2.

-------

The solution is to move the 2 Superpowers into middle ground - where their differences are reconciliable.

-------

Like what the China diplomats always say - meet each other half way.

This is the middle path resolution.

------

From 2 opposing extreme irreconcilable poles - move them into the middle - hence the middle path resolution.

------

And first have to start with their system of governance.

-----

1. Either further head-on confrontation that lead to world war 3 - where humanity perish.

2. Offer workable solutions to defuse the impending global bomb.

-----

When both system of governance are corrected and move into middle ground - all their differences and core interest will automatically be solved.

-----

And the Thucydides trap can't apply to China - because China win its legitimacy and support from other Nations - based on its merits and relationships - through wholesome governance, domestic support, ties with international countries, trade and business.

The accusations of autocratic government no longer apply.

-----

Difficult issues like HK, Xinjiang, Tibet and possibly Taiwan - can also be resolve.

-----

Got time then elaborate.

This is the key to resolve the seemingly unsolvable deadlock.

-----

Because 2 blocs will snatch scarce resources - as they are not sharing it and trade on it for mutual benefits - hence world war break out.

In world war 2, nazi facism and ancient jap want to snatch rich resources in China and SE Asia - started World war 2.

------

Trump fast track the breaking the world apart into 2 Blocs with his :-

1. Trade war (turn inward) - force China to do dual circulation.

2. Tech war - force China to develop its own tech instead of trade in tech parts.

3. Financial war - force China to develop digital yuan and break away from US dollars Swift system.

Now in front of us is impending head-on confrontation that need to be defused quickly before it degenerate into 2 blocs and trigger World war 3.

Alaska spark and fury - also give indication how urgent it is to defuse the 2 Superpowers tension.

-------

Google Translate

如果国家支持，那么由于两个集团之间的不可调和的分歧，第三次世界大战将破裂。

这就是第一次世界大战和第二次世界大战。

-------

解决方案是将这两个超级大国移到中间地带，使它们之间的分歧可以和解。

-------

就像中国外交官总是说的那样-半途相逢。

这是中间路径分辨率。

------

从2个相对的极端不可调和的极点-将它们移到中间-因此达到中间路径分辨率。

------

首先必须从他们的治理体系开始。

-----

1.导致第三次世界大战-人类灭亡的进一步正面对抗。

2.提供可行的解决方案以化解即将来临的全球炸弹。

-----

当两个治理体系都得到纠正并进入中间立场时，它们的所有差异和核心利益将自动得到解决。

-----

修昔底德陷阱不能适用于中国-因为中国凭借自身的优缺点和关系-通过健全的治理，国内支持，与国际国家的联系，贸易和商业，赢得了其合法性和其他国家的支持。

专制政府的指控不再适用。

-----

香港，新疆，西藏和台湾等棘手问题也可以解决。

-----

有时间再详细说明。

这是解决看似无法解决的僵局的关键。

-----

因为两个集团将抢夺稀缺的资源-因为他们不共享资源而是为了互利而进行交易-因此爆发了世界大战。

在第二次世界大战中，纳粹主义和古代日本想夺取中国和东南亚地区的丰富资源-爆发了第二次世界大战。

------

特朗普以他的：-迅速将世界分解为2个集团

1.贸易战（向内转）-迫使中国进行双重流通。

2.技术战争-迫使中国发展自己的技术，而不是技术零件贸易。

3.金融战争-迫使中国发展数字人民币并脱离美元Swift系统。

现在，摆在我们面前的是即将发生的正面对抗，必须迅速消除对抗，才能退化为两个集团并触发第三次世界大战。

阿拉斯加的火花和愤怒-也表明缓解2个超级大国紧张局势的紧迫性。

-------

========

1. Mr LKY in the 1970s coax Mr Deng Xiaoping to transform China from Central Planned Economy into Market Economy - and China become the 2nd largest economy in the World. (Economic transformation)

2. Now in year 2021, I coax China to transform from Communism into the Hybrid system of Democracy in Communism - to prevent China-US confrontation. (Political transformation)

Not sure can succeed or not. (Transformation into a great nation - must transform not only economically but also politically)

If successful, China will have successfully  transformed into a modern developed nation - not only economically but also politically - the last inflection point - the most difficult part of the journey (transforming the political system).

=====

China can:-

不发一粒子弹。

以心收服天下。

Not firing a bullet.

But using your heart to win over the world.

======

Google Translate

1.李光耀先生在1970年代鼓励邓小平先生，将中国从中央计划经济转变为市场经济-中国成为世界第二大经济体。 （经济转型）

2.现在是2021年，我鼓励中国从共产主义转变为共产民主的混合体系-防止中美对抗。 （政治转型）

不确定能否成功。 （转变为一个伟大的国家-必须不仅在经济上而且在政治上也要转型）

如果成功的话，中国将成功地成为一个现代化的发达国家，不仅在经济上而且在政治上也成为最后的拐点，这是旅程中最困难的部分（转变政治体系）。

=====

中国可以：-

不发一粒子弹。

以心收服天下。

不发射子弹。

但是要用心去赢得世界。

======

======

共产 = 同志 = 以民为主 以人为本 = 党领导同志 = 同志普选制 = 一种社会组织的理论或系统，其中所有财产归社区所有，每个人根据自己的能力和需要作出贡献和接受。.

Communism = Comrade = With Citizens and Humanity at its Core = Party Leader Comrade = Universal Suffrage = a theory or system of social organization in which all property is owned by the community and each person contributes and receives according to their ability and needs.

This is democratic process in Communism.

这是共产主义中的民主进程。

====