Singapore - Global Transport Hub

https://vt.tiktok.com/ZSCwQDATf/

PAP - Singapore Global Transport Hub.

@Babe:[08/07, 5:18 am] ☸️  Danny 心: I am very impressed with our Government Global Transport Hub concept - that integrates air, sea and land transport into One Unified Transport system - driven by AI and autonomous systems.

AI will help to prioritise, optimise and suggest the best optimal routes (be it air, sea or land) which is most cost effective - making Singapore a preferred, automated, best customer service transit points or final destination to our air and sea hubs.

@Babe:[08/07, 5:19 am] ☸️  Danny 心: Remind me of F-35 computer & sensors in the sky - integrating and communicating air, sea and land assets into a MDF file (Mission Data File) - the brain of one integrated lethal force.

====

"Workers' Party MPs warn against over-reliance on mega transport projects.

During a debate on the future of transport, Workers' Party MPs questioned Singapore's port and airport expansion plans, the 2016 sale of Neptune Orient Lines and the pace of the country's autonomous vehicle rollout."

https://www.channelnewsasia.com/singapore/wp-warns-over-reliance-mega-transport-project-singapore-parliament-6238341#:~:text=Workers%27%20Party%20MPs,autonomous%20vehicle%20rollout.

====

@Babe:Additional flaws on WP Alternative Policies (Jul 2026 Parliment)

1. WP (Gerald Giam and Jamus Lim, in total 6 WP MPs) mention that Singapore should not expand the capacity of Changi Airport T5 & Tuas Port - as future demand is uncertain - it will be a fiscal drag if capacity exceed demand.

a. Singapore Airport and Seaport is the best in the World, and highly patronise by the World travellers, cargo transhipment, trade, logistics - is WP suggesting shrinking & downsize our air and sea ports capacity ?

A reduced capacity will have the immediate impact of restricting travellers and cargo from landing in our air and sea ports due to congestion - the effect is an immediate drop in our trade, business, investment and travel revenue.

----

@Babe:2. WP quoted that for sea ports - Northern Arctic sea route or Thailand land bridge if implemented could divert maritime trade away from our ports .

WP also say that if aircraft become long range and more efficient - the hub & spoke transit hub will be bypassed as aircraft go direct to the destination without landing in transit hub.

a. We have a web of bi-lateral FTAs and multi-lateral FTAs such as RCEP, CPTPP, Digital Economy etc.

Trade, business, investment, travel, logistic etc is a guarantee - such that goods, business people, travellers, cargos, logistic will have to land at out sea ports and airports to conduct business, investment, MICE, meetings, seminars, events, stage play, travelling to our tourist spots etc.. --- Hence we will have a predetermined demands of air and sea landings in Singapore.

----

@Babe:b. Our bunkering services - fuel, LNG, Green Energy etc, Financial services, Global Port management System, Integrated Transport Hub (that integrate Air, Sea, Land hubs), Insurance service, Arbitration services, International Legal Service, MRO (Maintenance, Repair and Operations) service to maintain aircraft, ships, tankers etc - will have an anchor points and fixed customers demand, contract etc - to pull aircaft and ships to land at our air and maritime ports.

----

@Babe:c. The Singapore and Malacca straits service more ports of call compared to the Arctic Sea Route as we are at the heart of global transshipment, vessels traveling this route can service a vast network of customers and load/unload cargo at multiple major ports en route (eg. China, Japan, ASEAN, Australia, New Zealand, India, Middle East, Europe, Africa)

While Arctic passages can shave off travel time between Northern Europe and Northeast Asia by roughly 30%, they lack supporting port infrastructure. Additionally, extreme weather mean they are mainly used for point-to-point energy transport (oil and gas) rather than multi-stop container trade. Arctic of no major port of call.

----

@Babe:d. Thailand land bridge a threat to Singapore Tuas ports?

- World maritime ports 80% are through maritime - as supertankers can carry millions of barrels of oil or 25,000 TEUs or containers per ship..

- For Thailand land bridge, by saving 4 days - a supertanker unload 25,000 containers into 25,000 lorries (1 container per lorry) (or millions of barrels of oil) in one port. Travel a long distance on roads, find another supertankers to unload 25,000 containers from 25,000 lorries (1 container per lorry) to the supertanker (or millions of barrels of oil) - do you think the saving of 4 days + the cost of 25,000 lorries + loading and unloading of containers can be less costly and time consuming than Singapore Tuas port?

- I think WP MPs got to use their brains (when commenting in Parliament)!

Pardon my language - for intelligent persons at the highest office !

----

@Babe:e. Singapore are attracting many RHG (Regional HQ) into Singapore, top executives, high flyers executive, MICE attendees, business people, premium travellers will have to fly to Singapore airports to conduct business, investment, trade, air cargo, logistics.

Concerts with popular singers, F1 plus other events will attract premium travellers + our continuous refurbished tourism spots such as Greater Sentosa, Founders Memorial Hall, Long Island, T5, Jewel Changi Airport, Rain Vortex, Shiseldo Forest Valley, Marina Bay, MBS & RWS refurbishment casino visitors etc.

Also there are influx of ultra rich family offices, wealthy people, gold hub, etc

----

@Babe:What make WP MPs come to the conclusion that Singapore should shrink our T5 and Tuas Ports?

If WP is to lead Singapore - Singapore future will be doomed - because WP MPs have no foresight, no visions, unable to think out of the box, non-strategic, unable to maneouver Singapore into a 立于不败 position - but instead fall into defensive, spiral inwards position - that will doom Singapore future.

PAP govern - Singapore will fly.

WP govern - Singapore will die.

====