REACH (Telegram) 94 - What are your views on the priorities outlined by President Tharman for inclusive growth through refreshed economic strategy, use of technology, and strengthening community ties amid global uncertainty?
(SK)
12 Sep 2025 (10am - 7pm)
REACH (Telegram)
REACH Singapore, [12/9/2025 9:45 am]
Dear Contributors,
Welcome Back! 😊
⏰ We will be opening the chat from 10am to 7pm today. ⏰
House Rules (short version of our Terms of Use) to keep in mind:
1. Be kind and respectful. We all want to be in a safe space to share our views.
2. Any and all threatening, abusive, vulgar or racially, religiously and ethnically objectionable content is prohibited.
3. Consider the quiet ones among us and give them a chance to comment.
4. No need to repeat your comment or in different forms (including caps) - we heard you loud and clear the first time.
5. Let's protect each other's privacy and keep contact details in this group what it should always be - confidential.
Full set of Terms of Use: https://www.reach.gov.sg/Participate/reach-telegram-group/REACH-Telegram-Group-Chat-Terms-of-Use/
We will strive to uphold these rules to ensure this is a safe space for all.
Please be assured that the points made by participants during the chat are aggregated and shared with relevant agencies.
The topic will be posted shortly.
Thank you.
Megan 😊
REACH Singapore, [12/9/2025 10:01 am]
📢 Topic 📢
A set of 10 recommendations was released on 11 Sep, Thursday, by the trilateral group, comprising Ministry of Manpower, Ministry of Transport, the National Trades Union Congress (NTUC) and ride-hailing platform Grab, which was tasked to look into the issue of foreigners illegally performing platform work. The recommendations would be adopted in phases by nine platform operators, and the recommendations include stronger enforcement and tougher penalties against illegal point-to-point rides.
Broadly, the group’s 10 recommendations aim to protect the livelihoods of Singapore’s roughly 67,600 regular platform workers and champion fairer and more transparent payment structures and incentive schemes.
💬 What are your views on the recommendations to strengthen protection for local platform workers? How can they be better supported?
The recommendations were announced at a press conference by Senior Minister of State of Manpower and Health Dr Koh Poh Koon, Senior Minister of State for Transport Sun Xueling, NTUC Secretary-General Ng Chee Meng and Grab’s group managing director of operations Yee Wee Tang.
📌 Stamping out illegal undercutting
Dr Koh said a key consideration for the recommendations was that they should retain the advantages of the platform ecosystem while being able to be implemented in a sustainable manner.
Aside from tougher penalties, the government will strengthen enforcement against illegal point-to-point rides by engaging online platforms to take down apps, channels and advertisements that facilitate illegal ride-matching. The government will also strengthen its own ability to block or remove these if online platforms are uncooperative, said the trilateral group.
📌 Fairer and safer platform work
For fairer and safer platform work, platform operators and platform work associations will work together to develop a set of industry-wide principles on payment issues and incentive schemes, said the trilateral group.
Together, platform operators and platform work associations will also identify key information to provide to platform workers to address anxieties around income uncertainty, and schedule regular meetings to discuss key issues. Platform work associations will also continue to encourage platform workers to prioritise and take care of their health and safety, reiterating their individual responsibility.
📌 More scrutiny on outsourced workers
The trilateral group pointed out that some foreigners who perform platform work are legitimate work pass holders. These foreign workers are employed by third-party fleets under outsourcing arrangements with platform operators. They may also be in-house delivery staff for food and beverage or retail businesses.
These individuals differ from platform workers as they do not receive tasks through an algorithm and are paid a fixed salary by their employer, said Dr Koh.
👉 https://www.channelnewsasia.com/singapore/illegal-platform-work-account-sharing-foreigner-grab-trilateral-group-recommendations-5342661
👉 https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/transport/requiring-platform-operators-to-report-suspected-illegal-work-among-work-groups-recommendations
----
365, [12/9/2025 10:14 am]
Agree with preventing people from loaning their platform worker accounts, but think that the ride hailing is taking out a legitimate market demand. There is currently no legal door-to-door service.
Apart from this, looking around social media (anectodal), it seems like many consumers have the consensus that the supposedly illegal ride hailing services provide a better service on top of door-to-door and lower prices. Such as the drivers being more helpful to load and carry luggages, to the legal taxi drivers being reluctant to turn on stronger air conditioning.
Even disregarding the price differential, the availability of service and the service attitude is a huge reason for the shift in consumer behavior. I believe that if these issues are not resolved, it'll be a never-ending cat and mouse game. There will continue to be consumers willing to take the risk, and illegal ride providers adapting to the authorities. Price differential is just a convenient scapegoat of an excuse to complain about the unfairness.
REACH Singapore, [12/9/2025 11:00 am]
[ Poll : I am confident that the recommendations proposed by the trilateral group will protect the livelihood of platform workers.
Share your reasons in the chat! ]
- Strongly agree
- Agree
- Neutral
- Disagree
- Strongly disagree
REACH Singapore, [12/9/2025 11:01 am]
Dear Contributors,
We want to HEAR MORE from you!
💬 What are your views on the recommendations to strengthen protection for local platform workers? How can they be better supported?
We have had good feedback from this group, and we hope that we can keep the discussion robust and active!
Do also share your opinion by participating in our polls! The poll questions are pinned for easy reference, and your vote is anonymous.
Thank you!
Megan 😊
Adam, [12/9/2025 11:03 am]
The gov loves ai. But what happens when ai makes some jobs obsolete? Is the gov gonna ban ai to protect jobs?
Same thing here. Why are we protecting low skill labor when it is so accessible across the border. The discourse should instead be about the strain the foreigners put on our infrastructure. Mrt breaking down every week because too crowded.
I think gov should regulate and allow these workers, but tax them to represent the cost to society, from environmental of trash disposal, to social of loss of jobs. When ai drivers take over, also tax for using road 24/7 and burning energy.
If they work while dodging taxes, well the law knows what to do. Maybe we also need to increase penalties and enforcement of financial crimes too.
Adam, [12/9/2025 11:10 am]
If the gov can get revenue from foreign labor, maybe it can offset the cost to society from difficulty of getting job, while making it less appealing for foreigners to take our jobs. If they take our job at least fund our cdc.
However at this time, it is too attractive to have a job in singapore with untracked pay. I wonder how singapore tracks all these with our very permeable border. If they cant track humans making money, how can we police drugs entering?
Hanny, [12/9/2025 11:16 am]
I don’t believe in shielding workers if that protection make us less competitive globally.
Platform workers should be treated like taxi drivers in the past. It’s a buffer zone for Singaporeans who are in between jobs or people who have no better options.
Adam, [12/9/2025 11:18 am]
But should we make such jobs a buffer. Whats the career path like? Can someone use 10 years experience as taxi driver and argue its people skills for a business job?
Adam, [12/9/2025 11:20 am]
One day, maybe in 10 years time when ai drivers are better than human, should we ban ai taxi companies? What if ai driving is far safer than humans? Are we gonna argue that its ok for a few people to die every year from car accidents since we need to protect jobs.
Hanny, [12/9/2025 11:24 am]
Is there any career path for platform workers? I feel that it’s very limited. Platform workers should not think that their work as platform workers is permanent. It should be treated as temporary works.
Adam, [12/9/2025 11:25 am]
Yeah. Temp work implies theres an exit
Hanny, [12/9/2025 11:25 am]
If AI replaces them one day then it will happen. Gov should not try to prevent that.
Adam, [12/9/2025 11:26 am]
If its really temp work, gov needs to work with singaporean platform workers on how they can improve their career long term
Adam, [12/9/2025 11:26 am]
On the other side is platform workers who are elders
Hanny, [12/9/2025 11:26 am]
Some will not see any exit. Hence, we need to keep it for Singaporean.
Hanny, [12/9/2025 11:27 am]
This is exactly how taxi drivers were treated in the past.
Adam, [12/9/2025 11:29 am]
Im arguing that the gov needs to see the bigger picture. These jobs are not worth protecting. They are likely to be replaced, either by cost cutting foreigners or ai.
We need to tax these work and also find a way such that singaporeans can get better jobs
Adam, [12/9/2025 11:31 am]
Worst case for platform work is ai becomes too good and can replace them easy. So gov need to prepare for that
Hanny, [12/9/2025 11:33 am]
As much as gov try to provide better jobs there will be people who will be stuck as platform workers.
By the time AI is good enough to replace platforms workers, hopefully the people have better options.
Adam, [12/9/2025 11:34 am]
By the time? I dont want a reactive government
Adam, [12/9/2025 11:35 am]
By the time our pop grows we can have more mrt
Adam, [12/9/2025 11:36 am]
We need our gov to prepare ahead of time
Adam, [12/9/2025 11:36 am]
Right now, do we see gov try to reskill and rejob platform workers?
Hanny, [12/9/2025 11:37 am]
Our gov plan many years in advance.
Adam, [12/9/2025 11:37 am]
Right now we have shortage of driving school instructor. Maybe gov can turn some long time taxi driver to instructor. Instructors are paid way more right
Hanny, [12/9/2025 11:39 am]
The problem is platform workers are treating platform work as permanent work. After a few years, these people have no value outside of platform works.
Hanny, [12/9/2025 11:39 am]
The incentive to reskill is small.
여자친구, 첫사랑 🏆, [12/9/2025 11:39 am]
This is worth considering.
여자친구, 첫사랑 🏆, [12/9/2025 11:40 am]
Or like maybe 2 jobs or something.
Adam, [12/9/2025 11:40 am]
Yeah as an example
Adam, [12/9/2025 11:40 am]
We also have lack of ambulance driver
Adam, [12/9/2025 11:41 am]
Got drivers for stuff like bus. Cargo whatever in terminal 5.
Jun Ming, [12/9/2025 1:14 pm]
I think I have use illegal cross border service to Malaysia. Their service is good. Good attitude, point to point no need to carry luggage and bring us conveniently to our destination. In terms of safety although in terms of insurance may be compromised but I don't see much difference
Jun Ming, [12/9/2025 1:16 pm]
So to combat illegal cross border service we need to make it more appealing for legal ones to survive. Illegal one's can bring me to Thailand and have the flexibility to bring me to eat on the way can legal ones do so
Jun Ming, [12/9/2025 1:18 pm]
Within Singapore I think most people use legal ride hailing service despite the price because it's convenient and safe
Adam, [12/9/2025 1:25 pm]
One way to make cross border less appealing is to reduce local col. Why so many people going overseas?
Jun Ming, [12/9/2025 1:29 pm]
Tbh going jb I wouldn't use illegal service. I just go to take a bus over
Adam, [12/9/2025 1:30 pm]
Maybe it depends on person. Probably more worth if big family do it
Jun Ming, [12/9/2025 1:30 pm]
Then take grab in Malaysia more worth it
Jun Ming, [12/9/2025 1:31 pm]
It's only when I want to go further up then I will use illegal service
Jun Ming, [12/9/2025 1:32 pm]
For eg. Kl, Malacca, Penang
Jun Ming, [12/9/2025 1:34 pm]
So I hope gov can consider legal services up to Thailand border
Jun Ming, [12/9/2025 1:34 pm]
If government is serious
365, [12/9/2025 1:35 pm]
Not very realistic for sg drivers. It takes a very long time, and unlike Malaysian drivers who can still continue fetching passengers in Malaysia after dropping off in Thailand, sg drivers likely will have to drive all the way back to sg.
365, [12/9/2025 1:37 pm]
Door to door service is the biggest upside of the illegal ride services. If legal services cannot match that, you'll never resolve the issue.
365, [12/9/2025 1:37 pm]
And a better service attitude would help as well
Jun Ming, [12/9/2025 1:41 pm]
I think grab have the capability to do that. Why not license cross border taxi that can fetch anywhere in Singapore and Malaysia. With a slightly higher price within local
Jun Ming, [12/9/2025 1:42 pm]
Just have a category called cross border taxi
Jun Ming, [12/9/2025 1:42 pm]
Or long distance taxi
Jun Ming, [12/9/2025 1:43 pm]
Anything below 60km or any distance that gov favour or not crossing border the app will not book that type of taxi
Jun Ming, [12/9/2025 1:46 pm]
So this to allow Singaporean pick up from kl to Malacca and get another passenger
Jun Ming, [12/9/2025 1:47 pm]
While Malaysian drivers couldn't pick up within Singapore
Jun Ming, [12/9/2025 1:49 pm]
This will then guide consumers pick up the legal services
Jun Ming, [12/9/2025 1:50 pm]
Cause right now Singaporean got no choice but to choose illegal service
Adam, [12/9/2025 1:52 pm]
Got choice. Just buy a car and use causeway. Point to point very the big bad gov dun like. Just like the healthy alternative to vapes is the expensive less risky cigs
Jun Ming, [12/9/2025 1:53 pm]
Bruh not familiar with traffic dangerous
Adam, [12/9/2025 1:53 pm]
Skill issue
Jun Ming, [12/9/2025 1:54 pm]
Plus need vep
Adam, [12/9/2025 1:55 pm]
Gov logic. Not everyone needs to go to malaysia. Do you want your meal in reasturant? Or hawker center? Or JB?
Jun Ming, [12/9/2025 1:56 pm]
Go jb I will have mak mak and restaurant
Jun Ming, [12/9/2025 1:57 pm]
Can save space for housing
Jun Ming, [12/9/2025 1:57 pm]
😂
Adam, [12/9/2025 1:58 pm]
Small space expensive here. Maybe got couples doing national service in malaysia every week
Adam, [12/9/2025 1:58 pm]
🤔 gov can subsidize them
REACH Singapore, [12/9/2025 2:03 pm]
📢 Topic 📢
REACH Singapore, [12/9/2025 2:27 pm]
Dear Contributors,
We want to HEAR MORE from you!
💬 What are your views on the recommendations to strengthen protection for local platform workers? How can they be better supported?
We have had good feedback from this group, and we hope that we can keep the discussion robust and active!
Do also share your opinion by participating in our polls! The poll questions are pinned for easy reference, and your vote is anonymous.
Thank you!
Megan 😊
LCL (Danny 心), [12/9/2025 2:57 pm]
This cross border point to point ride hailing service by private drivers don't benefit Singapore:-
1. It eat into license taxi cross border business.
2. It eat into our private hire business and taxi services within Singapore - eg. Our comfort, smrt taxi etc, Grab, go jek etc.
3. JB private hire will clog and lead to congestion in our roads.
4. It will cause more accidents if road are congested and the cross border private hire rush for times to get more customers - how to claim from foreign drivers.
5. Local pay a big bomb for Coe to use cars on our road - this JB cross border private hire pay nothing to ply and clog our roads and deprive Singaporeans from owning cars due to congestion and congestion make us discomfort with too many JB cars.
This could lead to discontentment - and could trigger a political costs to our government.
LCL (Danny 心), [12/9/2025 3:00 pm]
In addition, they are illegal.
Foreigners should not be allowed to breach our laws and do illegal activities in Singapore.
Else Singapore will decay, corruption, hanky panky creeps in by allowing illegal activities to brew among us.
Adam, [12/9/2025 3:01 pm]
Go after to company closing one eye then you see action very fast
Adam, [12/9/2025 3:02 pm]
Right now we are blaming foreigners taking job like how trump wants to deport illegals working in farms
Adam, [12/9/2025 3:02 pm]
No noney to squeeze from these people. Lets squeeze grab
Adam, [12/9/2025 3:03 pm]
For telegram independant stuff need more active enforcement and big fines
LCL (Danny 心), [12/9/2025 3:13 pm]
Singapore has make arrangement with the Malaysia government to licence more picking up points in both causeway for licence taxis and possibly through apps.
I feel that such arrangement is more orderly and legally arrange.
Singapore should not go back to the old practice of 霸王车。 Illegal practice of picking up passengers on the street:-
1. Without insurance - and if accidents happen, passengers are not protected and could harm our people and cars in Singapore.
2. Kidnapping do occur - eg. Picking up targets here and then drive to ulu place across the border and then demand ransom - cannot trace and save hostages (this is what happens overseas).
3. Taking away jobs from local private hires and our taxi drivers here who need to earn a living.
4. Clogging our roads, car parks, and could drive dangerously to pick up more passengers.
Hence I support our government efforts to clamp down on illegal cross border private hire - whether foreigners or our private hire that pick up passengers across the border.
I support pre arranged negotiated licence cross border taxi or hires - to ensure legal and orderly travel crossing borders.
To safeguard our people jobs here, safety for all residents here and most important convey the message that illegal activities are not welcome in Singapore and laws will catch up with people doing illegal or hanky panky activities.
LCL (Danny 心), [12/9/2025 3:21 pm]
I also feel that even passengers taking illegal cross border hires should also be fine - so that the entire chain of eco system that propagate illegal cross border hires are discouraged.
Notices can be placed at all entry and exit points at all land, air and sea immigration checkpoints to remind local and foreigners that we mean business and don't break our law.
Singapore want to be squirky clean and law abiding.
No hanky panky or attempt to break our law will be tolerated.
Else our reputation of a clean nation will be tarnished.
This is how we build our reputation since LKY time - as clean, orderly nation to attract investors and put money to our shores that we are honest, trustworthy, reliable, one with integrity and law abiding nation - a model for the world to emulate.
LCL (Danny 心), [12/9/2025 3:26 pm]
Many civil servants and officials from many countries come to our civil service college to learn effective, efficient and honest governance in Singapore and we train so many foreign officials including Johor officials.
The last thing we want to do in actions - is to say one thing and do another thing.
Our thoughts, speeches and actions - must be coherent to think, say and do what we preached.
No hanky panky should creep into our system - else our governance system will decay and fall one day.
And no foreign countries will respect us and learn from us.
Jun Ming, [12/9/2025 3:27 pm]
The only way to make illegal service goes off is to make the legal competitive and better than the illegal ones
LCL (Danny 心), [12/9/2025 3:27 pm]
This should be the right attitude.
Jun Ming, [12/9/2025 3:28 pm]
It's always demand and supply. If legal ones does not met the consumers demands then of course consumers will find illegal service
Jun Ming, [12/9/2025 3:30 pm]
You just search sg JB taxi you will see a lot of websites
LCL (Danny 心), [12/9/2025 3:30 pm]
Why Singapore is a shining example and practically lead the world in all aspect - is because of our right core moral values - that has win respect by countries all over the world since we break from Malaysia and become independence.
The last thing we want to do is to let decay start with wrong moral values and the whole system will crumble.
Just look at US now, the system starting to decay and the whole empire will be crumbling because unwholesome values are allowed to creep into the system.
上梁不正下梁歪。
Once we allowed wrong values creep in, decay will sets in and everything fall apart.
We must not tolerate and rationalise illegal activities.
This is the pitfall we must always safeguard and secure and never allow such value to creep in.
LCL (Danny 心), [12/9/2025 3:43 pm]
Correction:-
Singapore tie up with India if can absorb half of our semiconductor ($66 billion) should be $6 billion.
LCL (Danny 心), [12/9/2025 3:46 pm]
Our total export to US is ($53 billion) should be $43 billion...
The rest of products about ($30.37 billion) should be $20.37 billion.
LCL (Danny 心), [12/9/2025 3:54 pm]
Also I support close cooperation and consultation among the trilateral groups - Government, Platform operators and Platform association union representing our platform workers :-
1. To safeguard the jobs of our platform workers
2. To report any illegal cross border activities (public who witness illegal activities should also report).
And our people should refrain from taking illegal cross border rides or report suspected illegal delivery.
3. Platform operators should manage their apps and incentives to safeguard jobs locally for the platform workers under their care and ensure foreign platform workers stay in their border and cannot cross our borders doing illegal activities.
Likewise our platform workers should also not cross into the border and do illegal activities over there.
We need to set a good example for our neighbours to emulate.
REACH Singapore, [12/9/2025 4:04 pm]
📢 Topic 📢
LCL (Danny 心), [12/9/2025 4:05 pm]
1. Let bring back PM Lawrence Wong and President Tharman 2025 theme and value of promoting "We" value as our core values.
2. We value - means ability to emphatise and ability to see things in another person's shoes - not looking only at our own interests but also others' interest.
3. I believe many of our platform workers are not in this forum - busy picking up passengers and making deliveries.
4. Hence even though we are not doing their work and sweating out like them - the "We" core values must constantly inherent in us to look out for them and take care of their well beings and their livelihoods.
5. We must be able to slip into their shoes, understand their pain points trying hard to earn a living, speak for them and take care of their well being - in the "We mindset" not "I or My mindset" - as it doesn't concern me.
6. As fellow Singaporeans, we must also ensure they are well taken care off as they slog hard to earn a living for themselves and their families members. And not 落井下石。
7. The least we can do is to lend a voice for them, help them, support them - not put them down as it doesn't concern me.
LCL (Danny 心), [12/9/2025 4:12 pm]
Another very challenging development has taken place.
And I am very sure this will concern many people.
Trump and his administration is coining 25% tax on all American MNCs who hire foreign people in US and their MNCs overseas.
This means American MNCs invest in Singapore and the rest of the world are now impacted.
The intent of the new initiative is to make American MNCs pull back and onshore as Trump tariff to make America MNCs to pull back is not very successful.
About 5,800 American MNCs employing 191,400 (Source:- Google AI) Singaporeans workers could be impacted.
Now wonder whether Singaporeans impacted by this move will panic or not.
LCL (Danny 心), [12/9/2025 4:13 pm]
"US lawmakers propose 25% tax to penalize hiring foreign workers over Americans".
Does this means American MNCs in Singapore that employ Singaporeans will be tax 25%?
https://www.financialexpress.com/business/investing-abroad-us-lawmaker-proposes-to-tax-american-firms-25-for-hiring-foreign-workers-3970276/#:~:text=Workers%20Over%20Americans-,US%20lawmakers%20propose%2025%25%20tax%20to%20penalize%20hiring%20foreign%20workers%20over%20Americans,-The%20HIRE%20Act
LCL (Danny 心), [12/9/2025 4:13 pm]
HIRE Act 2025: Proposal of 25% tax on companies for hiring foreign workers; how will it impact India? - The Times of India https://share.google/W0zj0RcVb7yLPYPWp
REACH Singapore, [12/9/2025 5:01 pm]
Dear Contributors,
We want to HEAR MORE from you!
💬 What are your views on the recommendations to strengthen protection for local platform workers? How can they be better supported?
We have had good feedback from this group, and we hope that we can keep the discussion robust and active!
Do also share your opinion by participating in our polls! The poll questions are pinned for easy reference, and your vote is anonymous.
Thank you!
Megan 😊
LCL (Danny 心), [12/9/2025 5:02 pm]
1. At a first glance, this news look detrimental to us because America MNCs (about 5,800) are our largest foreign investors employing 191,400 Singaporean workers 2021. (Source:- Google AI).
2. If American MNCs pull back (onshoring) because Trump impose tariff on imported goods and now 25% tax on foreign hires - our GDP, output and jobs will be hit.
3. Trump wield 2 sticks to force America firms to onshore:-
- Tariffs
- 25% tax on foreign hires
Tariffs
a. Tariff for importing their cheaper goods back and sell to Americans.
But no tariff if goods are manufacture in US.
b. As tariffs is not very effective in forcing American MNCs to pull back, now he wants to use tax on American firms that employ foreign workers.
Both measures are to make America firms investing in foreign countries expensive so as to coerce them to pull their investment back to America and jobs for Americans.
4. But despite the looming threat, there are always 2 sides of the coin.
5. Now let us first analyse why Trump tariff on imported goods fail to onshore American MNCs?
a. Global supply chain come from all over the world (be it raw materials, semi-finished goods, intermediate products, labour and talents etc) - in effect economic principles of competitive advantage and exchange of labour make economic sense for world countries to trade - so that the final goods and services are most cost effective, foster innovation and final products will be of good quality.
b. Imposing tariff and replacing it with import substitution (ie. Everything local made) erase all the merits of trade - resulting in inefficiency, less innovation, as a result higher cost and lower quality products which will be less competitive and unable to compete with foreign products and services.
c. Besides, America market though big is about $29 trillion GDP.
The world market is $111 trillion - US $29 trillion = $82 trillion.
American MNCs selling to the world market find no incentives to onshore all their business back. Only those American MNCs that sell solely to US market will want to onshore back (but not many because most businesses won't just sell to one market - but spread their business all over the world).
Besides some who onshore back encounter alot of difficulties in their manufacturing process as US conditions - be it materials, workers competency and willingness to work are obstacles.
d. As US employment goes down due to various reasons:-
i. More unemployment as import business are badly hit by tariffs, tech companies cutting jobs due to AI etc - domestic consumption go down.
ii. Big capital outflow as foreign investors sell their bonds and not taking up new US treasury bonds.
This spell bad for as 70% of US GDP are generated by domestic consumption.
This means $29 trillion US GDP market will shrink. All the more, there are less incentives for American MNCs to onshore their business back to US with a shrinking consumption market and a poorer population with lesser and lesser spending power.
e. Hence Trump exorbitant tariffs fail to force many American MNCs to onshore. Even foreign investors that largely sell to US market also encounter alot of difficulties onshoring into a hostile US market.
LCL (Danny 心), [12/9/2025 5:02 pm]
25% tax on foreign hires
1. American MNCs invest in foreign countries because of various reasons.
Let us analyse what are the possible reasons:-
a. Diversify their operations - so as not to put all eggs in one market. (Eg. Insure against labour unrest, lack of talents or skilled workers, hostile legislation for business, need unimpede global supply chain).
b. Need to enter into other regional markets (eg. Using Singapore as springboard to ASEAN markets) and other Asian markets in which we have webs of multilateral or bilateral FTAs.
c. Tap into our financial hub for funding.
d. Tap into our more cost effective skilled workers and talents.
e. Tap into our more tax friendly, stable government, business friendly legislation, union friendly, good infrastructure and facilities that foster business and trade - to grow their business.
f. Most important, American MNCs want to sell to our growing and expanding consumption regional markets not a market whereby capital are flowing out, business environment are getting more and more hostile, talents are moving out, skilled workers are not readily available, business operations are unfriendly, consumption are decreasing, countries are over the world are pivoting away from the market.
g. Hence despite the looming dual sticks to force American MNCs to onshore - I personally feel that the impact on us will not be impactful as American MNCs will do up their sum.
But we must not be complacent and our Government, partners business, unions must work closely with the American MNCs to ensure their business needs are met so that they remain rooted in Singapore.
At the same time, American investors continue to invest in Singapore.
LCL (Danny 心), [12/9/2025 5:43 pm]
Apparently this topic reveal the social class and fault line is very apparent.
Unity across our various social class is still a long journey.
The concept of "We mindset" - still need alot of cultivation...
As the ability to develop Empathy is still in its infancy.
And Empathy must come from the heart, not lip service.
LCL (Danny 心), [12/9/2025 6:00 pm]
Hence in our education system and our society, we must build Elitism as our competency in knowledge, education and work skill.
But Elitism must not take root in our heart.
Empathy must replace Elitism when come to fostering our social values.
Only then our "We mindset can take root and flourish" - that will help to cement our social fabric as a whole unified nation.
REACH Singapore, [12/9/2025 6:04 pm]
📢 Topic 📢
RY, [12/9/2025 6:16 pm]
It is good that the Govt is finally taking action and plan to revise the bill, to protect those legal-working platform workers and their income
For those platform operators, they should also abide the employment law in SG, and sametime take care of their platform workers eg health
It should be a healthy and fairer competition among the platform operators and workers
Hence those breaking the law eg illegal platform workers/operators, should be penalised ultimately
And the penalty shd be stringent to deter people for mis-using/breaking the law also
To maintain a safe and happy working, the law/society/environment/employers are essential factors/consideration
REACH Singapore, [12/9/2025 6:46 pm]
Dear Contributors,
⏰ We will be closing the chat in 15 minutes ⏰
Thank you very much for being part of our Telegram chat and participating actively.
Goodnight!
Megan 😊
REACH Singapore, [12/9/2025 6:59 pm]
Dear Contributors
We will be closing the chat for today.
Thank you very much for being part of our Telegram chat and participating actively.
Goodnight!
Megan 😊
====