Friday, January 30, 2026

REACH (Telegram) 117 -   What are your views on the recommendations from the Economic Strategy Review? What more can be done to ensure that the Singapore economy remains competitive?

(SK)

30 Jan 2026 (10am - 7pm)


REACH (Telegram)

REACH Singapore, [30/1/2026 3:02 pm]

Dear Contributors,

Welcome Back! 😊

⏰ We will be opening the chat from 3.15pm to 8pm today. ⏰

House Rules (short version of our Terms of Use) to keep in mind:

1. Be kind and respectful. We all want to be in a safe space to share our views. 

2. Any and all threatening, abusive, vulgar or racially, religiously and ethnically objectionable content is prohibited. 

3. Consider the quiet ones among us and give them a chance to comment. 

4. No need to repeat your comment or in different forms (including caps) - we heard you loud and clear the first time. 

5. Let's protect each other's privacy and keep contact details in this group what it should always be - confidential. 

Full set of Terms of Use: https://www.reach.gov.sg/Participate/reach-telegram-group/REACH-Telegram-Group-Chat-Terms-of-Use/

We will strive to uphold these rules to ensure this is a safe space for all. 

Please be assured that the points made by participants during the chat are aggregated and shared with relevant agencies. 

The topic will be posted shortly. 

Thank you. 

Megan 😊

REACH Singapore, [30/1/2026 3:16 pm]

📢 Topic 📢

On Friday (30 Jan), the Economic Strategy Review (ESR) provided seven key recommendations for Singapore's economy and the labour market. 

The recommendations are developed after consulting with businesses and workers over 60 engagements, events, and company visits.

💬 What are your views on the recommendations from the Economic Strategy Review? What more can be done to ensure that the Singapore economy remains competitive?

📌 Background of ESR

The ESR was unveiled by Deputy Prime Minister Gan Kim Yong in August 2025 to chart a forward-looking blueprint to secure quality opportunities for Singapore’s businesses and workers. The ESR reports to the Singapore Economic Resilience Taskforce (SERT), which was set up in April 2025 to help businesses and workers navigate immediate uncertainties arising from the US tariffs. 

The ESR consists of five different committees, each focusing on different aspect of Singapore's economy.

These recommendations are part of a mid-term update by the ESR, and the full report with final recommendations will be published in mid-2026

One of the key recommendations was that Singapore should establish itself as a global artificial intelligence leader and push for AI adoption across its economy. The review also emphasised that Singapore should also evolve its skills and training systems to make lifelong learning a practical reality for workers.

📌 Recommendations on the economy

Four recommendations focus on driving Singapore's economic growth. The ESR noted that AI will revolutionise economies and industries, saying Singapore must stay ahead to harness its transformative power and put the country on a different growth trajectory.

“We should do more to position Singapore as a location of choice where companies and top talent come together to develop, test, deploy and scale innovative and impactful AI solutions,” the ESR committees said in a media factsheet.

Beyond AI, Singapore should also strengthen its position in manufacturing sectors where it already has a foothold, such as semiconductors, healthcare and specialty chemicals.

National research and development resources should be deployed to secure global leadership in high-value sectors, capitalising on Singapore's trusted reputation, the ESR committees said.

📌 Recommendation on the labour market

The ESR also added that workers should be more proactive in acquiring skills, career planning and entrepreneurial in seizing new opportunities.

“We should evolve our skills and training models, to enable training to be agile and responsive to worker and industry needs, and for Singaporeans to upskill and reskill throughout their careers,” the ESR committees said.

This will require more flexible pathways blending training and work, a national AI workforce strategy, a more nimble career and skills system, and a review of how government support is organised.

The ESR committees also recommended strengthening career transition support, including working with employers on earlier retrenchment notices and providing tailored placement and training.

The ESR committees also mentioned that businesses needed to innovate and reposition themselves, with Singapore enabling them to proactively navigate transitions and pivot to viable opportunities.

“This could entail providing practical support for businesses to better understand their business health and make transition plans, including rationalising or offshoring parts of their operations to seize new opportunities,” the ESR committees said.

📌 Full list of recommendations

The full list of seven recommendations are:

- Transform Singapore’s advanced manufacturing industry to establish global leadership in key sectors.

- Pursue emerging opportunities in quantum, decarbonisation and space technology to push the growth frontier of the economy.

- Establish Singapore as an AI leader where companies and top talent can develop solutions.

- Strengthen connectivity with global markets and aggressively support local firms to internationalise.

REACH Singapore, [30/1/2026 3:16 pm]

- Uplift and transform jobs to broaden Singapore’s range of good jobs.

- Evolve skills and training models to make lifelong learning a practical reality.

- Provide practical support for businesses to navigate transitions. 

👉🏻   https://cna.asia/45HL3ui

👉🏻 https://cna.asia/4t6O1m7 

👉🏻 https://str.sg/CA3z

👉🏻  https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/singapore-launches-new-economic-strategy-review-to-stay-ahead-of-global-shifts

----


REACH Singapore, [30/1/2026 3:17 pm]

[ Poll : 1) I am confident that the recommendations and measures will continue to grow Singapore's economy. (Please share your reasons in the chat!) ]

- Strongly Agree

- Agree

- Neutral

- Disagree

- Strongly Disagree

REACH Singapore, [30/1/2026 3:17 pm]

[ Poll : 2) I am confident that the recommendations and measures will support workers and create good jobs. (Please share your reasons in the chat!) ]

- Strongly Agree

- Agree

- Neutral

- Disagree

- Strongly Disagree

365, [30/1/2026 3:27 pm]

Being a global leader in key sectors is a double edged sword. On one hand, we have additional bargaining power to get more favourable trades, on the other hand, it can invite geopolitical trouble. Computer chips is quite an example of this.

365, [30/1/2026 3:31 pm]

I would also suggest the government to diversify the sectors for training. If everyone's being trained with the same skillset for the same industry, they will cannibaslise each other and suppress wages. Train many people in different skills, so each of them fulfill a different role and advance together.

It could just be my uninformed and ignorant impression, but it seems like the government is focusing on AI and information technology related sectors only.


LCL (Danny 心), [30/1/2026 3:39 pm]

1. AI has been identified as the main mover in every industries to boost productivity for workers and business.


2. Hence education and training will likely to emphasize more and more AI driven skillsets, exploiting AI agents to perform work, using LLM to generate codes etc.


3. If students and workers are increasingly moving along this line, there is a danger that students and workers will lose their foundational knowledge and basic skillsets while relying heavily on AI to help students and workers generate the outputs - without understanding the AI codes for example to debug, check for errors due to AI hallucinations, refine the codes, perform troubleshooting and test the codes, perform system integration.


4. Hence in education, IHL, Universities, students must still be trained in the foundation knowledge and skillsets without the help of AI.


5. And then at the later part of each lessons, train using AI as a tool to generate codes - by learning how to formulate problem statement to feed into AI and LLM.


6. While relying AI to give our students and the workers the productivity boost, education and training must still ensure our students and workers possess the foundation and fundamental skillsets eg. Able to code from start to end without AI.


7. Otherwise, our new generation of students and workers will heavily rely on AI, without AI, students and workers cannot do foundation coding.


8. This means our new generation of students and workers will not acquire the basic skillsets in which previous generation possess.


LCL (Danny 心), [30/1/2026 3:58 pm]

Hence I propose IHLs, Universities to set 2 exams.

For example to illustrate for computer science (network) students, they will be test on 2 skillsets:-

1. Generate codes and test cases for 2 routers connectivity using OSPF (without AI).

Show routing successfully completed through ping and traceroute.


2. Use ChatGpt LLM to generate 2 routers connectivity via OSPF.

Modified the AI generated codes to include MD5 security for ospf connectivity.


LCL (Danny 心), [30/1/2026 4:00 pm]

So for 1st exam, students and workers must be able to code from scratch without using AI - to determine whether students and workers have acquired the foundation skillsets of network.


LCL (Danny 心), [30/1/2026 4:01 pm]

! Interfaces

interface GigabitEthernet0/0

 ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0

 no shutdown

interface GigabitEthernet0/1

 ip address 10.0.0.1 255.255.255.252

 no shutdown

! OSPF Configuration

router ospf 1

 router-id 1.1.1.1

 network 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 area 0

 network 10.0.0.0 0.0.0.3 area 0

end

write memory

🔹 Router 2 (R2) Configuration

Copy code

Cisco

enable

configure terminal

hostname R2

! Interfaces

interface GigabitEthernet0/0

 ip address 192.168.2.1 255.255.255.0

 no shutdown

interface GigabitEthernet0/1

 ip address 10.0.0.2 255.255.255.252

 no shutdown

! OSPF Configuration

router ospf 1

 router-id 2.2.2.2

 network 192.168.2.0 0.0.0.255 area 0

 network 10.0.0.0 0.0.0.3 area 0

end

write memory


LCL (Danny 心), [30/1/2026 4:03 pm]

For 2nd exam, the above codes will have been generated by ChatGpt LLM.

Prompt:- Generate cisco configuration codes - using ospf routing between 2 routers.


But candidates will be tested on amending the Cisco codes to include MD5 security in OSPF connectivity without the help of AI ChatGpt.


LCL (Danny 心), [30/1/2026 4:04 pm]

! Interfaces

interface GigabitEthernet0/0

 ip address 192.168.2.1 255.255.255.0

 no shutdown

interface GigabitEthernet0/1

 ip address 10.0.0.2 255.255.255.252

 ip ospf authentication message-digest

 ip ospf message-digest-key 1 md5 OSPF-MD5-KEY

 no shutdown

! OSPF Process

router ospf 1

 router-id 2.2.2.2

 network 192.168.2.0 0.0.0.255 area 0

 network 10.0.0.0 0.0.0.3 area 0

 passive-interface GigabitEthernet0/0

end

write memory


REACH Singapore, [30/1/2026 4:07 pm]

📢 Topic 📢


LCL (Danny 心), [30/1/2026 4:08 pm]

So both exams:-

1. Self coding (no AI).

2. AI generated codes (but students amend the AI codes to include MD5 security) 

Will provide the teachers, professors and the employers the confidence that the students and workers possess the foundation skillsets and knowledge - without losing their basic skills and knowledge.

And yet able to tap on AI to massively boost their productivity.


LCL (Danny 心), [30/1/2026 4:14 pm]

In other words, a worker who come to job interview must possess the skillsets and be able to do :-

1.

2.

Proficiency in 1 only - no good because it shows that the candidate not able to make use of AI to boost his productivity.


Proficiency only in 2 is also no good. 

It means the candidate only know how to use AI to generate codes but does not possess the foundation skills.

If AI hallucinate, or unable to do system integration, this candidate will be at a loss to do debugging and perform system integration - because the candidate does not possess the skillsets of coding - as he rely on AI to do it for him.

So workers and students who possess only 2nd skillsets without the 1st skillsets is not valuable for the company.


LCL (Danny 心), [30/1/2026 4:28 pm]

1. Also notice that for advanced manufacturing, HBM (high bandwidth memory) and GPU chips will be the next frontiers of AI growth.


2. GPU chips production seems to be coming out only from Taiwan and South Korea.

Singapore still unable to attract chips manufacturers to design and manufacture GPU chips in Singapore.

If we succeeded in doing so, our advanced manufacturing sectors will surely boom.


3. But luckily, we manage to secure Micron to pump billions of dollars to design and manufacture HBM for us.

Certainly a big boost to our advanced manufacturing.


LCL (Danny 心), [30/1/2026 5:05 pm]

1. I think AI and IT are use as enabler and productivity tools to boost every industries and every sectors.


2. For example, IT enable online banking, eCommerce, eTransaction, online marketplace, social media etc - allowing business of various industries to leverage on internet to sell their products and services and thus expanding their customer base and reach.


LCL (Danny 心), [30/1/2026 5:10 pm]

3. Customers can put fixed deposit via online banking and no need to take a trip down to the banks.

4. People can buy insurance products via eTransaction through the web.

5. Retailers can sought Livestream social media influencers to market and sell their products.

6. People can buy products via shopping platforms such as shoppe, Lazada, Amazon, Taobao etc.


LCL (Danny 心), [30/1/2026 5:11 pm]

7. People no need to take a trip down to do their passport - everything can be done on the web.


LCL (Danny 心), [30/1/2026 5:12 pm]

8. Shippers can use online website to file all their maritime documentation.


LCL (Danny 心), [30/1/2026 5:14 pm]

https://www.businesstimes.com.sg/singapore/smes/nanyang-optical-plans-enter-voluntary-liquidation-after-65-years-will-close-4-6-stores

Nanyang Optical plans to enter into voluntary liquidation after 65 years; will close 4 of 6 stores.

The eyecare chain’s remaining two stores, which are under franchise arrangements, will continue operating and are unaffected.

This was alongside weaker sales at the outlet, as more customers in Woodlands flock to Johor Bahru to buy related products, he observed.


LCL (Danny 心), [30/1/2026 5:15 pm]

A very established local spectacle business is forced into liquidation because it is not able to transform itself.

If it is able to market its products online, probably he can grow and expand its business rather than go for liquidation.


LCL (Danny 心), [30/1/2026 5:29 pm]

The reasons why I propose to emphasize:-

1. Acquire foundation skillsets 

2. Use AI to boost productivity 

Is not to make the same mistakes like previously, we are coaxed to outsource all our coding, programming and software development to India, Philippines in the jest to save cost while our workforce concentrate on project management.

As a result, we lose the basic foundation skillsets and engineering knowledge to other countries.

We are force to in-sourced our software development and IT engineering skills back a few years later, as our economy lost our vital hardcore skills.

Also recall there is one opposition TJS who say we should offshore the whole manufacturing sectors to other low cost countries but only concentrate in service industries like US.

Luckily we didn't do it, else we end up like US - lose out the global manufacturing capabilities and capacity to China.

So in the case of AI, we must never make the same mistakes again by outsourcing coding to AI and lose the coding skills.

Once lost, very difficult to restart and regain it.


Khai Mun L., [30/1/2026 5:42 pm]

Don't agree with becoming leader in AI. Very hard to compete against countries that pump money into state controlled companies to attract local and overseas talents. SG cannot afford to all-in to this sector while letting other industries lapse. There is limited manpower and resources

Khai Mun L., [30/1/2026 5:46 pm]

Plus the term AI is used understood differently by some leaders. We should get digitalization first before wholesale into generative or AI learning models.

So many other tech stuff to consider first-power, water to maintain servers, cyber security, integration between departments and society, balance the hiring of foreigners to train/work in advanced AI firms, better ways of counter misinformation from AI etc

Jun Ming, [30/1/2026 5:58 pm]

Ai and automation are leading. If growth are all related to ai which means jobs will be lost while gdp increase. Then attracting foreigner will be redundant as it only creates limited jobs to Singaporean 

2.if there's massive fail in ai then Singapore will be stagnant

Jun Ming, [30/1/2026 6:02 pm]

manufacturing decarbonisation  and space and ai interesting

REACH Singapore, [30/1/2026 6:02 pm]

📢 Topic 📢


LCL (Danny 心), [30/1/2026 6:12 pm]

I think the fear of AI replacing jobs is real.

Very important to reassure workers that AI won't replace jobs.


Jun Ming, [30/1/2026 6:18 pm]

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DUH8Psyj5WD/?igsh=MTAyaGc1cW9sbjk3ZA==

Jun Ming, [30/1/2026 6:19 pm]

Gan say that economic growth does not equal to new jobs


LCL (Danny 心), [30/1/2026 6:21 pm]

"Humans must learn to collaborate with artificial intelligence: Josephine Teo".

https://www.straitstimes.com/tech/humans-must-learn-to-collaborate-with-artificial-intelligence-josephine-teo#:~:text=Humans%20must%20learn%20to%20collaborate%20with%20artificial%20intelligence%3A%20Josephine%20Teo


Jun Ming, [30/1/2026 6:21 pm]

The truth is when technology improve less entry level jobs is needed

Jun Ming, [30/1/2026 6:22 pm]

you cannot expect everyone is in mid level or senior level

Jun Ming, [30/1/2026 6:24 pm]

The boss will say since ai can do this for me why would I need you

Jun Ming, [30/1/2026 6:25 pm]

DBS expects to shrink contract and temp jobs by 4,000 over next 3 years as AI replaces roles 

https://www.straitstimes.com/business/banking/dbs-ceo-piyush-gupta-sees-job-cuts-of-4000-temp-staff-as-ai-replaces-roles

Adam, [30/1/2026 6:26 pm]

Why are they personifying AI. Its like saying people need to learn to collaborate with cars. AI should be a tool. Maybe these people talk to a chatbot intimitely at home

Jun Ming, [30/1/2026 6:28 pm]

Sometimes it's not about learning about ai, it's the nature of it. The job is unavailable at the first place

Jun Ming, [30/1/2026 6:28 pm]

Are those 4000 people don't want to learn about ai?

Jun Ming, [30/1/2026 6:29 pm]

They are more willing to learn but there's no vacancy for them


LCL (Danny 心), [30/1/2026 6:30 pm]

[26/01, 3:29 pm] ☸️  Danny 心: "JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon says he welcomes government ban on mass-firing people for AI: ‘We’re going to cure a lot of cancers’".

 https://fortune.com/2026/01/22/jpmorgan-chase-ceo-jamie-dimon-ai-layoff-income-assist-workers-elon-musk-sam-altman-universal-basic-income/#:~:text=JPMorgan%20CEO%20Jamie%20Dimon%20says%20he%20welcomes%20government%20ban%20on%20mass%2Dfiring%20people%20for%20AI%3A%20%E2%80%98We%E2%80%99re%20going%20to%20cure%20a%20lot%20of%20cancers%E2%80%99

[26/01, 5:41 pm] ☸️  Danny 心: Goodness.

JP Morgan CEO prediction is true.

If AI displace fresh graduates, there will be civil unrest.

All lose.

Hence companies must employ despite using AI.


Jun Ming, [30/1/2026 6:31 pm]

It's already a tool in majority of the students during research. Lol. Even ntu penalise using ai in assignment

Jun Ming, [30/1/2026 6:31 pm]

Who don't use gpt nowadays

Jun Ming, [30/1/2026 6:34 pm]

Even in resume people are using ai

Jun Ming, [30/1/2026 6:35 pm]

Companies will say I am still employing just that not as much


LCL (Danny 心), [30/1/2026 6:38 pm]

Yes.

Generally this is the fear many workers will be facing.

But as long as government and business can convince all the workers will have jobs, AI will complement us rather than replace us.

Using AI will bring higher income in terms of higher salary because of higher productivity, then I think we will feel ok.

Now is the uncertainties cause by AI that creeps in fuel by many negative reporting in US and the US companies - about AI replacing jobs.


Jun Ming, [30/1/2026 6:39 pm]

Another thing to note is decarbonisation and being a leader of ai is in a conflict position

Jun Ming, [30/1/2026 6:39 pm]

Ai generates a lot of carbon footprint

Ethan, [30/1/2026 6:39 pm]

https://www.channelnewsasia.com/singapore/psle-singapore-exam-dsa-desmond-lee-5891926

Ethan, [30/1/2026 6:39 pm]

This is absurd

Jun Ming, [30/1/2026 6:40 pm]

Which I foresee ai carbon tax coming out

Jun Ming, [30/1/2026 6:46 pm]

Nobody knows what to do as AI drives a surge in carbon emissions

https://www.straitstimes.com/opinion/nobody-knows-what-to-do-as-ai-drives-a-surge-in-carbon-emissions


LCL (Danny 心), [30/1/2026 6:47 pm]

One way to cushion the impact of carbon emissions from AI is to use green energy eg. Nuclear energy (non-radioactive type).


LCL (Danny 心), [30/1/2026 6:49 pm]

Source :- Google AI

Big tech firms are increasingly turning to nuclear energy to power energy-intensive AI data centers, seeking 24/7, carbon-free, and reliable electricity. Companies like Amazon, Google, and Meta are signing deals for advanced nuclear technology, particularly Small Modular Reactors (SMRs), which offer a smaller footprint and scalability. Nuclear is viewed as a crucial, sustainable alternative to fossil fuels to meet soaring demand, with projects accelerating to come online by 2030. 


LCL (Danny 心), [30/1/2026 6:58 pm]

This is the same sentiment when computerisation kick-in in the 1990s - many fear that computerisation and IT will replace many jobs.

Though it does replace jobs like typists (many people type using computers) not typewriters.

Computerisation, IT and internet have in fact trigger a full blown digitalisation jobs throughout the economy.

I suspect AI will do the same.

But this period of uncertainties, how AI transform jobs or will it replace our jobs - make everyone nervous.

Only when the AI dust settle down, then workers will know how to anchor ourselves.

Meanwhile there will be anxieties.

But as long as our government, business and union workers work closely together, I think all our people jobs will be secured.

But as workers or business, we need to adjust and transform to exploit AI as it comes.

Else we could end up like those established business - need to close down or liquidate.


Jun Ming, [30/1/2026 7:26 pm]

Before it settle down there definitely have a job shortage as people do not know what is in demand

Jun Ming, [30/1/2026 7:26 pm]

Or rather what is the right skills is needed.

Khai Mun L., [30/1/2026 7:26 pm]

There can never be guarantee that jobs won't be lost because of AI.

Companies, not government, make the decision based on their own business needs.

Jun Ming, [30/1/2026 7:27 pm]

Ai have make it hard to identify what is real what is ai

Jun Ming, [30/1/2026 7:28 pm]

A lot of misinformation can be spread easily, it's very hard to verify

Jun Ming, [30/1/2026 7:29 pm]

Especially knowledge based stuff

REACH Singapore, [30/1/2026 7:45 pm]

Dear Contributors,

⏰ We will be closing the chat in 15 minutes ⏰

Thank you very much for being part of our Telegram chat and participating actively.

Goodnight!

Megan 😊

RY, [30/1/2026 7:55 pm]

AI is an unevitable trend, whether U like it or not. We have to keep up to pace whether in education/work/different industries n etc

I recently attended the AI course with the skillsFuture credits. I now understand with AI, it may replace human jobs eg graphic designer/analyst and etc

AI is a new arena that can do many things eg analysing/marketing in biz n etc. Many new software eg Canva n etc, with the use of AI that may generate images/videos/content/analysing/slides n etc 

It really helps to slim-line many work process with AI

However, there are many cons also eg deepfakes that can be generated just using AI

Further, many copyrights issues fm the contents/videos/images generated fm AI

REACH Singapore, [30/1/2026 8:00 pm]

Dear Contributors

We will be closing the chat for today.

Thank you very much for being part of our Telegram chat and participating actively.

Goodnight!

Megan 😊


====


Wednesday, January 28, 2026

REACH (Telegram) 116 -   What are your views on the Government's approach towards building a “We-first” society? What more can be done?

(SK)

28 Jan 2026 (10am - 7pm)


REACH (Telegram)

REACH Singapore, [28/1/2026 9:45 am]

Dear Contributors,

Welcome Back! 😊

⏰ We will be opening the chat from 10am to 7pm today. ⏰

House Rules (short version of our Terms of Use) to keep in mind:

1. Be kind and respectful. We all want to be in a safe space to share our views. 

2. Any and all threatening, abusive, vulgar or racially, religiously and ethnically objectionable content is prohibited. 

3. Consider the quiet ones among us and give them a chance to comment. 

4. No need to repeat your comment or in different forms (including caps) - we heard you loud and clear the first time. 

5. Let's protect each other's privacy and keep contact details in this group what it should always be - confidential. 

Full set of Terms of Use: https://www.reach.gov.sg/Participate/reach-telegram-group/REACH-Telegram-Group-Chat-Terms-of-Use/

We will strive to uphold these rules to ensure this is a safe space for all. 

Please be assured that the points made by participants during the chat are aggregated and shared with relevant agencies. 

The topic will be posted shortly. 

Thank you. 

Megan 😊

REACH Singapore, [28/1/2026 10:00 am]

📢 Topic 📢

A "we first" society could include foreigners, and the idea encourages individuals to focus on the community instead of themselves, Deputy Prime Minister Gan Kim Yong said at a dialogue at the Institute of Policy Studies '(IPS) 2026 Singapore Perspectives conference on 26 January. Mr Gan was responding to a question about how speeches that evoke a “we first” society may be perceived as referring to Singaporeans, unintentionally excluding foreigners, especially when leaders call on individuals to be involved in integration efforts.

Mr Gan shared his interpretation of a “we first” society, emphasising that "rather than focusing on ourselves, focus on the collective. And the ‘we’ could include foreigners."

💬 What are your views on the Government's approach towards building a “We-first” society? What more can be done?

In a separate panel at the Institute of Policy Studies’ Singapore Perspectives conference on 26 January, Acting Minister for Culture, Community and Youth David Neo also stated that building a “we first” society in Singapore will be challenging not due to a lack of resources or laws, but because it requires a profound shift in how people here relate to one another. He added that such a society is one where people look beyond their own interests to contribute to the larger good of the community.

📌  Balancing Immigration and Social Cohesion

Deputy Prime Minister Gan Kim Yong said that with immigration, the key question is how to integrate foreigners and ensure that Singaporeans can work with them for the benefit of Singapore. He also noted that despite Singapore’s immigration policies, its citizenship growth rate has come down over time.

He also accepted that Singaporeans sometimes feel that they face a lot of competition at work from fellow Singaporeans, foreigners and even new citizens. “I think this sense of competition is real. We have to recognise that. But it is also something we have to accept that we just have to continue to compete with the rest of the world,” he added. "So we have to make sure that our people will be the most competitive in the world" said Mr Gan.

📌  Integration as a Two-Way Effort

One way to nurture a 'we first' society is to create opportunities for people to interact, and by doing so, deepen their understanding of one another in spite of differences, said Mr Neo. He cited examples of such interactions building across the island, such as how a dozen residents in Yio Chu Kang come together every month to prepare meals and organise activities for some 40 seniors, with food supplied by the local hawkers’ association. "We all have the capacity to initiate or support such efforts in our own spheres, and in our own ways,” he said.

Acting Transport Minister Jeffrey Siow, speaking at a panel discussion titled "Navigating Challenges to Social Cohesion: at the Institute of Policy Studies’ (IPS) Singapore Perspectives conference (26 Jan) also reiterated that all sides will have to make extra effort on this – newcomers must consciously want to integrate, contribute to the community, abide by norms here, and understand what it means to be Singaporean. Singaporeans must be open-minded too; they have to accept that the national identity today will evolve and it will take time for newcomers to adapt to local customs and practices, he added.

📌  Building a Shared Singapore Identity

Mr Gan stressed that it is important to continue to focus on measures that encourage and support social integration, especially with new citizens. "They have spent a good part of their life in a different culture, have different practices, maybe hold different values," said Mr Gan. "But the fact that they have decided to become Singapore citizens, they have decided that there's something common between Singapore and them … want to become part of this bigger fraternity," he added. The challenge is to see how to recognise the differences while expanding the common space between new citizens and existing Singaporeans to become a more dynamic society, he said.

REACH Singapore, [28/1/2026 10:00 am]

Useful Links

👉 https://www.channelnewsasia.com/singapore/we-first-society-foreigner-immigration-integration-ips-gan-kim-yong-5883906

👉 https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/politics/building-a-we-first-society-requires-deep-mindset-shifts-david-neo

👉 https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/politics/spore-must-do-more-integration-as-immigration-is-crucial-for-economy-amid-low-tfr-jeffrey-siow

----


Adam, [28/1/2026 10:59 am]

I believe in we first. We should include foreigners and and women in ns.

Doesnt have to be military. We have scdf nsf.

We have shortage of nurses for our elders. Need staff to cook good food for our young. We need more blood to serve the community over themselves

Adam, [28/1/2026 11:00 am]

Can we really have we first if only a quarter of the total population puts society before themselves?

REACH Singapore, [28/1/2026 11:02 am]

[ Poll : 1. I agree that immigration is crucial for Singapore’s economy. Please share your views in the chat! ]

- Strongly agree

- Agree

- Neutral

- Disagree 

- Strongly disagree 

REACH Singapore, [28/1/2026 11:02 am]

[ Poll : 2. I am comfortable with the pace of growth of foreigners in Singapore. Please share your views in the chat! ]

- Strongly agree

- Agree

- Neutral

- Disagree

- Strongly disagree

Adam, [28/1/2026 11:06 am]

If gov wants we first, dont half hearted do a system ripe for exploitation.

Everything has a price. Many singaporeans probably wont mind getting punched in the face if you give them a thousand dollars first.

There is a cost to having a higher population through immigration, but i think a societal cost needs to be paid. They enjoy the security paid by nsmen. Stability of our culture.

Adam, [28/1/2026 11:07 am]

I get the ideal the some things a 'priceless'. But realistically we need to put a sticker value on it, just like how insurance values human life and limb. Erp and coe puts a value to the strain of our transport infrastructure

REACH Singapore, [28/1/2026 11:08 am]

Dear Contributors,

Please take a moment to participate in our polls and share your opinion. 

The poll questions are pinned for easy reference and your vote is anonymous. 

We look forward to hearing your thoughts on today’s topic!

💬 What are your views on the Government's approach towards building a "We-first" society? What more can be done?

Thank you.

Megan

Andy, [28/1/2026 11:14 am]

This is a very natural progression for countries with declining birth rates. People are like fuel to a nation, we need to get from elsewhere if we do not have enough ourselves. 

So I think we also need to discuss on how best to increase birth rates as immigration is the consequence.

Separately, there is also the discussion on how we can be highly selective of immigration and whether 'ease of integration' is already a criteria or not.

As for the article.. it is a straightforward political statement. Nothing really to find fault with, takes 2 hands to clap, bla bla.

Andy, [28/1/2026 11:17 am]

Trump also mentioned (very bluntly) how US should be selective of migrants. I think Singaporeans have the same sentiment, we want quality people, courteous, helpful, valuable, but we should be tactful about it.

Adam, [28/1/2026 11:19 am]

I notice a lot residents have allegiences else where. They contribute a lot to cpf to have tax benefirts. Even can top up to get matched by the gov. Then can withdraw tax free when renounce. In a we first society, we need to tax people who withdraw the foreigner income tax rate. We cannot be letting other have me first while we bankroll them in matching schemes

365, [28/1/2026 11:25 am]

I agree with this, any full withdrawal outside of the normal 55 then 65, should be taxed as income. This amount was not taxed initially, so there is no double taxation. Once they withdraw as foreigners no longer in our system, this amount is basically a part of their cumulative income

365, [28/1/2026 11:26 am]

Does not punish Singaporeans for remaining Singaporeans, and also does not give a free pass of benefits for those not aligned with Singapore.

365, [28/1/2026 11:29 am]

Immigration as an economic solution is a bandaid that has been on for too long. I view this as an acceptable short term solution. But this "short term" has dragged on for too long, there seems to be no solution to the root cause for population structural issue

Adam, [28/1/2026 11:44 am]

I want to talk about the english proficiency of people in our country

Adam, [28/1/2026 11:45 am]

There are many customer facing workers that i cant communicate easily with as they only speak chinese

Adam, [28/1/2026 11:45 am]

What can the gov do about it?

Adam, [28/1/2026 11:46 am]

Can we force companies to send the staff to send the workers to english classes on their money?

Adam, [28/1/2026 11:49 am]

In a we first society that includes foreigners. There should be a effort to learn to communicate in english as most singaporeans speak it

Adam, [28/1/2026 11:49 am]

The gov of old saw the importance of everyone having a common tongue

Adam, [28/1/2026 11:50 am]

In a we first society, the business that hires non english staff needs to ensure their staff can speak it. Maybe help fund them

RY, [28/1/2026 1:05 pm]

SG is a multi-racial nation when started. SG immigration policy is expected due to declining birth rate. Even country like Japan due to low birth, is also opening up to immigration in recent years 

If USA didnt open her doors to foreigners after World War, dont think they may become prosperous and super power now

I suppose "We First" concept, should be also part of our Inclusive Society, as long as they are residents of SG, whether they are singaporean/PR/whatever pass they are holding eg employment/student/long term pass and etc 

However, although we are a inclusive society due to multi-racial culture, some policies eg MRSS/MMSS in CPF, only citizens can entitle. And Govt policies eg financial assistance shd prioritise singaporeans first always  

Maybe govt financial assistance should look at household income as a whole, and not at the type of housing sometimes eg Silver Support Scheme not extended to seniors staying in 5Rm flat? Shdnt the govt encouraging children to stay with parents, and looking after them when they are ageing over the years 

Having said that I find the SkillsFuture credits for singaporeans very useful. It is kind of encouraging matured workers to upskills & enhance knowledge, in the midst of the changing world eg technology/knowledge example AI 

Since PR has the choice of leaving/renouncing, then their entitlements/assistance/subsidy n etc shd be limited 

I am glad that the MRSS(Match Retirement Saving Scheme) is expanded to People with Disability of younger age starting 2026. As this is also part of the SG Enable, and people of disability, they shd entitle to more benefits/subsidy/financial assistance, so as to demonstrate our Inclusive Society Concept 

Many foreigners that I know and came to SG is quite impress that SG govt built "walkway shelter" for residents/lift at some overheadbridge and etc, that many countries may not have such facilities ..... 

It is also a gd initiative for Govt to start the MMSS(Matched Medisave Saving Scheme) this year. Hope govt may expand to those age 70 also, rather than btw 55-70 

I concur that if the PR renounced, then they shd not be entitled to any benefits fm SG govt, and their CPF shd be withdrawn with taxing, since they already earn interests over the years in Cpf

Jun Ming, [28/1/2026 1:26 pm]

Only when foreigner wanted to be in the we, contribute to Singaporean then we can only includes them in the we. If the new comer acts like yaya Papaya and don't respect Singapore culture, trying to overturned it then sorry even they are Singaporean it's hard to include in the we

Jun Ming, [28/1/2026 1:27 pm]

To be accepted in the "we" we have stringent criteria

Jun Ming, [28/1/2026 1:28 pm]

After all we Singaporean are very kind

Jun Ming, [28/1/2026 1:29 pm]

Birthrates will continue to fall if gov doesn't limit the capacity of intake of foreigner

Jun Ming, [28/1/2026 1:30 pm]

After all more competition means less resources which also means our offspring have a higher chance to lose out

Jun Ming, [28/1/2026 1:31 pm]

From a biology perspective

Jun Ming, [28/1/2026 1:32 pm]

So I propose in order to better integrate new citizens we need those new comer to be pr for at least 15 yrs.

Khai Mun L., [28/1/2026 1:57 pm]

How did you come to number of 15? Why not 5 etc..

REACH Singapore, [28/1/2026 2:01 pm]

📢 Topic 📢

Jun Ming, [28/1/2026 2:04 pm]

You need at least 10 yr to integrate mah plus new citizens tend to have a lot of connection overseas too so they every year will go back to their home land for a month or more also. When they become Singaporean rule of them needed to stay in Singapore for a certain number of days lifted. So 10-15 yrs will allow them to stay in Singapore long enough to integrate in

Khai Mun L., [28/1/2026 2:05 pm]

Personally, i believe the issue is because locals not making babies.

 an extreme idea, forced marriages since men have to do compulsory national service?

Jun Ming, [28/1/2026 2:06 pm]

Cause existing rules say 2 yrs

Jun Ming, [28/1/2026 2:06 pm]

Which I don't think can integrate lor

Jun Ming, [28/1/2026 2:07 pm]

And 5 yr very fast de covid to now already 5 yr

Jun Ming, [28/1/2026 2:08 pm]

10-15 yr will allow them to learn singlish well too

Daniel, [28/1/2026 2:10 pm]

I feel one way of having more people stay in Singapore is to allow double citizenship for children born to binational parents and having grown up in Singapore. Those people have very strong ties to Singapore and also have to serve NS currently but then at 21 have to pick one nationality. Some of them will chose to give up the Singapore passport because they want to go try out living in their other home country and later find it hard to come back because they don't have citizenship any more. I feel this group of people, having grown up here, do not have the same sort of conflict of interest linked to double nationals as people acquiring the citizenship when they are adult and this could strengthen the Singaporean core by encouraging more of them to chose to stay in Singapore.

Jun Ming, [28/1/2026 2:14 pm]

Nope. As tension build you never know if war comes in the future

365, [28/1/2026 2:26 pm]

This just allows them to play both sides, there's no benefit for them to renounce down the line, so they fully enjoy the benefits of a citizen without the need to commit

Khai Mun L., [28/1/2026 2:31 pm]

The benefits of being citizens come later in life and to their next generations (if PR or citizen). In the form of healthcare (more spending in old agr), lifelong payout from cpf, and school fees during young

Daniel, [28/1/2026 2:32 pm]

It works well for many other countries. And it's one way to get more Singaporeans to stay in Singapore. In the end have to weigh the pros and cons, but if people are against allowing more immigrants without ties into the country, then that's one option to counteract this a bit in my opinion. Because let's be frank, at 21 most people haven't sorted their life out yet, so maybe they'll come back and stay here after they finish their studies overseas (good for Singapore, no need to subsidise their studies) or to settle down and start a family. If we're really scared about them just reaping the benefits, then have them chose at 30 or 35 instead.

365, [28/1/2026 2:36 pm]

Professional employment as well. I know it's very common to portray in the media that companies are hiring only foreigners, but I've came across a non-insignificant number of recruitment favoring locals. 

This however might also be tied to the common practice and needs of the industry.

Adam, [28/1/2026 2:39 pm]

Even if you come across all these recruitment, is the listings real?

Adam, [28/1/2026 2:40 pm]

When you go to office what is listed might be different from what you see

365, [28/1/2026 2:40 pm]

Yes, I perform my checks and have a pretty high confidence that it is real

Adam, [28/1/2026 2:40 pm]

Lots of people get hired through other channels

365, [28/1/2026 2:41 pm]

These aren't even from me searching listings, they are HR people approaching me

365, [28/1/2026 2:42 pm]

Like I mentioned, this may also be heavily influenced by the needs of the industry, since I have not jumped industries yet

Jun Ming, [28/1/2026 2:45 pm]

I always envy new citizens as they can still go back to their Homeland for cheaper healthcare cost. For Singaporean we have nothing. No plan b

REACH Singapore, [28/1/2026 3:00 pm]

Dear Contributors,

Please take a moment to participate in our polls and share your opinion. 

The poll questions are pinned for easy reference and your vote is anonymous. 

We look forward to hearing your thoughts on today’s topic!

💬 What are your views on the Government's approach towards building a "We-first" society? What more can be done?

Thank you.

Megan


LCL (Danny 心), [28/1/2026 3:08 pm]

1. Immigration is an emotional topic - it apply not only to Singapore, but everywhere else in the World.


2. In the World where globalisation has taken a toll on citizens in the economic front, jobs - far right and nationalism rear its head - that has given rise to more tense geopolitical tussling and jostling.


3. Hence the discussion on today's topic, We first versus Me first - that touches on the inclusion of Foreigners into We first - will certainly see more robust and emotional discussion - because human basic natural raw instinct is to protect "Self" first before talking about "We first" much less about pulling in "foreigners" into We first.


4. In today's context of AI job distuptor, and Geopolitical tussling that make the economic pie smaller, emotions on immigration - the fear of adding an additional factor to "compete for jobs and affect the livelihood" while trying to emerge from AI and Geopolitics - is understandable.


5. Hence today's topic is not an easy topic - but must address head on - because it will affect our "existential" existence if not address properly - by first making people understand our predicarment we are in - and the needs for immigration.


LCL (Danny 心), [28/1/2026 3:18 pm]

1. First, our population will get old and getting older. There must be another generation of young citizens to take over the Country when the generation get old. 

But sadly the TFR is 0.97 - way below the replacement rate of 2.1.

That is, only 0.97 human produce every year to replace 2 adults lost - which is way below replacement of our older folks - and this is an existential threat to Singapore survival and the ability to thrive.


2. Now let us look at how we perform in the global stage ----- many Number 1 in global ranking on many fields.

https://vt.tiktok.com/ZSamhTjnU/

Singapore global rankings in the world in 2025.

How did we get so far as a "little red dot" - human capital, human talents.

Without sufficient replacement for our human capital - Singapore cannot come so far and perform so well.


LCL (Danny 心), [28/1/2026 3:25 pm]

3. Hence, there is a need to look at 2nd best option, Immigrants that are willing to come to Singpaore to contribute to our Economy, integrate well with our Society and Communities, willing to be Singaporeans, try to be Singaporeans, behave like Singaporeans, and immerse with our culture as Singaporeans and talk like Singaporeans (eg. in Singlish).


4. But of course such new immigrants and new citizens cannot be totally behave like Singaporeans as they come from another Countries and hence will inherit their home culture, languages, behavior, etc - but as long as they are willing to integrate with us - we need to open our hearts and minds to accept them and help them to integrate --- because we need them especially if they are talents that we need or they have something to contribute that will benefit all of us and make our Country stronger, better and prosperous.


LCL (Danny 心), [28/1/2026 3:40 pm]

5. To relate my experience with immigrants on the personal front. Without talented immigrants, my initial career upstart will not be as smooth. Because IT and computer science profession is just at its nascent stage at that time --- mainframe era.


6. My senior, a Malaysian PR is technically very sound - and nurture me from a fresh graduate to become a solid senior engineer.


7. My technical boss is also a Malaysia PR that have given me opportunities and useful roles to perform in many big projects.

Both are very nice and nuturing boss. 

Though very thankful to the person that recruited me is a Singaporean Manager.

And my 2nd interview is by a HK PR who is an Assistant Chief Executive.


8. Without immigrants, Singapore will have lacked the required skillsets and talents to function and grow - train and nurture local citizens to helm the new technologies.


9. Thinking aloud, Goh Keng Swee is a Malaysian from Malacca. On the hindsight, without GKS, Singapore will probably won't gain independence and self-rule. We won't have a first class financial system back by gold. Our Economy will not rise up well. Our industry will not have an upstart in manufacturing. We won't be able to start a capable full fledge SAF back up by defence contractors.


Khai Mun L., [28/1/2026 3:55 pm]

Locals to get married and make babies! Talk no use, do action.. haha


LCL (Danny 心), [28/1/2026 3:58 pm]

Unfortunately, many young folks want to remain singles.

And for some who married don't want to have babies.

Wonder how to improve our TFR to 2.1?


LCL (Danny 心), [28/1/2026 3:59 pm]

"IMF prepares for global run on US dollar.

The EU should issue more common debt to provide investors with an alternative safe asset to gold and US Treasuries, the Fund's managing director said".

https://www.euractiv.com/news/imf-prepares-for-global-run-on-us-dollar/#:~:text=IMF%20prepares%20for,managing%20director%20said


LCL (Danny 心), [28/1/2026 4:01 pm]

Btw this topic is extremely important for our government to look into.

US treasury and the global finance is ticking into a time bomb.

Important to have railguards at hand to safeguard our sovereign wealth and global investment.


Daniel, [28/1/2026 4:01 pm]

Yeah, and not only that. 2.1 means need to have more than 2 kids on average. I got 2 already, definitely don't want more. Most of the support is only for the first two years, after that not much. Also childcare leave is not enough to cover school closures and sickness etc. For us, it's too stressful and we decided not to have a 3rd one. So even those who want to have kids now often stop at 1 or 2.

Adam, [28/1/2026 4:01 pm]

Speaking of this, i heard there is a growing cultural shift. People dont officially get married. People go in 'situationships'

Basically people scared of commitment


LCL (Danny 心), [28/1/2026 4:02 pm]

This trend is no good for Singapore in our TFR.

Could cause more social problems.


Adam, [28/1/2026 4:02 pm]

From men they scared that marraige law favors women. Women want more freedom than tied down

Adam, [28/1/2026 4:04 pm]

Also relationship dynamics, women wants wealthier partner. But these days, women earn more than men especially early in career

Adam, [28/1/2026 4:06 pm]

So if people focus on work instead of setting with partner in their early adult years, how will the country grow?

Adam, [28/1/2026 4:06 pm]

At my 20s already stressed cannot get hdb

Jun Ming, [28/1/2026 4:06 pm]

Down to the core cost of living the main factors

Jun Ming, [28/1/2026 4:07 pm]

I am in my 20s right now but I fear to find a partner


LCL (Danny 心), [28/1/2026 4:07 pm]

When I started my career, my salary is only $1,600.

I got married and work hard in my career and very frugal in my spendings.

I still raise a family.

Grit and determination carry me through.


Daniel, [28/1/2026 4:07 pm]

That and also time factor. Having kids means burning all your leaves and free time on looking after. I can understand people don't want that.

Jun Ming, [28/1/2026 4:08 pm]

I got not enough money and time to try and error where scammers are out there and relationship sometimes can look like scam

Jun Ming, [28/1/2026 4:08 pm]

I got scammed in online dating app

Adam, [28/1/2026 4:09 pm]

Im scared of online dating

Adam, [28/1/2026 4:09 pm]

Nowadays got ai


LCL (Danny 心), [28/1/2026 4:09 pm]

Wonder if there are government sanctions dating agencies or apps to help Singaporeans or not.


Jun Ming, [28/1/2026 4:09 pm]

Coffee meets bagel is a good app

Adam, [28/1/2026 4:09 pm]

People might scrape your profile and do weird stuff

Jun Ming, [28/1/2026 4:10 pm]

But now I just not ready to find one lor

Jun Ming, [28/1/2026 4:10 pm]

No money

Adam, [28/1/2026 4:10 pm]

I wonder how they verify people real


LCL (Danny 心), [28/1/2026 4:10 pm]

Previously they have sdu, sds.

Now look like disbanded already.


Jun Ming, [28/1/2026 4:10 pm]

Hardly can feed myself

Jun Ming, [28/1/2026 4:10 pm]

Singpass


LCL (Danny 心), [28/1/2026 4:11 pm]

I thought government should partners with credible private dating agencies to help Singaporeans go dating and get hitched - work on credible dating apps as well.

Previously some of my relatives marriage is through sdu.


Adam, [28/1/2026 4:12 pm]

In dating app a lot of people also dont put effort. Many dont show proper photo. If apply job but your cv empty who hire? Same in dating

Jun Ming, [28/1/2026 4:12 pm]

Like a minister say nowadays not many people have close friends

Jun Ming, [28/1/2026 4:12 pm]

A friend you can call in 2am

Adam, [28/1/2026 4:13 pm]

Issue is where is the incentive for proper match? Whats stopping the companies to charge people monthly as long as they stuck single

Jun Ming, [28/1/2026 4:13 pm]

Money

Jun Ming, [28/1/2026 4:13 pm]

Dating is not a priority as everyone is lack of money


LCL (Danny 心), [28/1/2026 4:13 pm]

I think previously sdu are credible and they don't fleece participants.


Jun Ming, [28/1/2026 4:14 pm]

Those with money are focusing on how to stay relevant lol

Adam, [28/1/2026 4:14 pm]

🤔 on the topic of immigration, maybe need breeding visas

Jun Ming, [28/1/2026 4:14 pm]

With such a intense competition

Adam, [28/1/2026 4:15 pm]

I wonder how easy people who find partner overseas get to settle family here

Adam, [28/1/2026 4:15 pm]

Not uncommon give birth girl here and boy in foreign spouse country

Adam, [28/1/2026 4:16 pm]

So much for we first

Adam, [28/1/2026 4:16 pm]

Gov should look into people gaming the system

Adam, [28/1/2026 4:16 pm]

See how to make the dream of we first work

Daniel, [28/1/2026 4:18 pm]

I know a lot of such families. If they want to live her long term, they'll chose to register their boys here. Doesn't make sense financially otherwise.

Andy, [28/1/2026 4:20 pm]

That's a very interesting perspective.. why leh? Just because boys need serve NS 18 years later?

Andy, [28/1/2026 4:20 pm]

Don't understand what's the main consideration here

Daniel, [28/1/2026 4:22 pm]

Yeah, most people I know will let their sons do NS unless they don't want to live in Singapore.

Andy, [28/1/2026 4:24 pm]

I understand that. But confused about what Adam said about 'give birth to girl here but boy in foreign spouse country'.

Daniel, [28/1/2026 4:24 pm]

Same, me too

Andy, [28/1/2026 4:24 pm]

😂😂


LCL (Danny 心), [28/1/2026 4:26 pm]

Actually "We" Concept is a profound philosophical concept.

Have written this long time ago when it was first coin - during PM Lawrence Wong opening speech - but no opportunity to post it.

Now can post it here.


LCL (Danny 心), [28/1/2026 4:27 pm]

Thursday, September 25, 2025

"We" Concept* (https://babe118.blogspot.com/2025/09/we-concept.html)

 "We" Concept*


1. Let us discuss the concept of "We" in policy formulation coin by our Government for Parliament 2025.


2. "We" in layman terms can also be referred to as "Empathy" - ability to stand into others' shoes while standing in your own shoes to look at issues and coining solutions or policies taking into consideration our own interests and others' interests into account as a starting point.

Hence any solutions and policies coming from the "We mindset" will benefits everyone including ourselves.


3. This encompasses the virtue of understanding and employing the "Larger whole" (the Greater Wheel) is more important than our own "selfish interest - that benefits only me or I (the Smaller Wheel).


4. Hence, we can visualise the extrapolation of "We" thoughts:-

a. Beginning with one point (Self interest) 。(one-pointedness)


b. Extend upwards, downwards, horizontally, vertically (上度,下度。横度, 竖度。)  + (Cross)

i. top people that can make decision and higher income groups;

ii. lower hierarchy that include lower income groups;

(both form the verticals),

iii. horizontally - our peers, middle income groups


c. And then transform into extending into the well beings of ( 三百六十度,无所不度。)🛞 (Greater Wheel)

i. all rounded considerations 360 degree - a wheel - every residents, citizens, PRs  &/or foreigners.

ii. also include animals, cats, dogs, wild animals.

iii. extending into global climate, coastal protection

iv. relationship and well being with foreign Countries, leaders and their countrymen.


5. In profound form, "We" concept of a person must encompass 3 important attributes :-

a. Selfless (ability to empathise not only with self, but also others)


b. Compassion (all policies must be compassionate - to bring positive outcomes to self and others, and must not cause harm or miseries to others while benefitting self)


c. Anchor on Wisdom - hence coming out with wholesome solutions or policies that is a workable one, balanced ones, based on merits and trade off (with selfless and compassion disposition).

The Enlightened Mind.


6. And if a person is able to consistently, inherently, mindfully employing the "We" concept based on all the above considerations - then policies and solutions coined - will be a wholesome one that include the merits of :

i. Win-win outcomes

ii. Mutual benefits

iii. Ability to competently resolve issues with minimal adverse side effects.


This is the profound explanation of "We" concept in respond to PM Lawrence Wong statement in Parliament.


Addressing parliament in his first speech at the start of the term of government since becoming prime minister, Mr Wong added: “We will strive to create more fulfilling lives for you. And not just for a few among you, but for all of you."

The PM spoke about a “we first” society (https://www.channelnewsasia.com/singapore/ndr-lawrence-wong-society-collective-action-singapore-spirit-5298826) at his National Day Rally speech in August, Mr Wong urged Singaporeans to embrace their individuality and help everyone be the best possible versions of themselves.

“At the same time, we have to look out for one another and lift each other up. Only then can we be greater than the sum of our parts,” he added.

Source :- CNA news


Khai Mun L., [28/1/2026 4:31 pm]

We are too money-minded nowadays, don't put priority on character and morales


LCL (Danny 心), [28/1/2026 4:32 pm]

Morals.


Khai Mun L., [28/1/2026 4:32 pm]

Actually as long as willing to work hard, won't starve in sg. Don't compare with others and get jealous of their wealth. Work hard/smart and get your 'revenge'

Adam, [28/1/2026 4:35 pm]

The construction worker is the hardest worker in sg. Literally building this nation. Surely they can retire here right?

Andy, [28/1/2026 4:39 pm]

Striving for success is what brought SG here today by our predecessors. Not a bad thing. But yes about morals - parents play a key role to instill values in their children and set a good example. To a large extent, not something people can 'learn from books' in school

Andy, [28/1/2026 4:41 pm]

Hard worker? Yes. Hardest worker? Hmm, I'm sure there any many working hard too in other ways just not physically

Adam, [28/1/2026 4:41 pm]

We all know the morals our parents instil plays a key role.

How can we ensure that non singaporeans in singapore have good morals in a we first society?

Andy, [28/1/2026 4:41 pm]

By the way.. is it related to your profile picture 😂

Adam, [28/1/2026 4:42 pm]

We have no control on how other countries raise them. Is there something that needs to be done for integration?

Andy, [28/1/2026 4:42 pm]

Very good question. I like to hear your suggestions

Adam, [28/1/2026 4:43 pm]

Firstly mandatory english profiency test. If cmi then have to take lesson. If awol then go db. Just like ippt

Andy, [28/1/2026 4:43 pm]

Hahaha

Adam, [28/1/2026 4:43 pm]

If we can afford instructor to eyepower us do ippt. We can have en classes for those that cant speak it

Andy, [28/1/2026 4:43 pm]

Ippt never go db la.. just pay $100 fine 😂

Andy, [28/1/2026 4:44 pm]

I think many times they know how to speak but choose not to. We should tag a voice recorder and make sure they hit their daily speech quota

Adam, [28/1/2026 4:45 pm]

Tbh doing daily study, even small is how people learn language

Andy, [28/1/2026 4:49 pm]

By the way I am joking about the voice recorder.. haha 😂

Adam, [28/1/2026 4:50 pm]

But another thing i wanna bring up is enforcement of laws. Singapore is known for strict laws but i feel enforcement is getting very lax. I see people doing selfish behavior from pmds to littering.

Singaporeans are probably too kind or too apathetic. Our rule of law is only as strong as its enforcement. Immoral people will try to get away with things. If we dont step up enforcement, our morals as a society will deteriorate

Adam, [28/1/2026 4:51 pm]

Btw do you guys see more litter these days? Rats too

Andy, [28/1/2026 4:52 pm]

Have, rats and rodents, even right beside chinatown mrt in the rubbish area. People anyhow throw and nobody clear

Adam, [28/1/2026 4:52 pm]

Last month i saw garbage strewn on the void deck. The wind blew a untied rubbish bag and scattered the contents. I think its one of the effects of the plastic bag fee

Andy, [28/1/2026 4:53 pm]

Must enforce. those errant PMD especially

Daniel, [28/1/2026 4:55 pm]

This I also observe. People too lazy to call town council to remove bulky items or carry it to the bin centre, so they just dump it at the void deck. Same with recycling bins, full of rubbish and overflowing. There should be more enforcement for these kind of things.

Nicholas, [28/1/2026 5:30 pm]

Considering Singapore is a small country, immigration numbers should be tightly managed, otherwise it will get more crowded everywhere. It is already very crowded in Singapore. Perhaps applying the COE concept that controls vehicle growth to immigration might work?

Nicholas, [28/1/2026 5:33 pm]

Also don't quite understand the results of the two polls above, majority (over 50%) says immigration is crucial for Singapore's economy, yet majority also says they are uncomfortable with pace of growth of foreigners here - why the misalignment?

Zackermax, [28/1/2026 5:48 pm]

Drinking water is crucial for sustaining life, yet I am not comfortable with drowning. There is no misalignment.

Khai Mun L., [28/1/2026 5:53 pm]

Morals not limited to foreigners. The recent 'crazy' or rude people are Singaporeans. Covid lady, spitting water on train, release captured crows, throw items from high floors

Khai Mun L., [28/1/2026 5:56 pm]

I agree that enforcement getting lax. Not sure is due to not enough manpower available to do the tiring, sometimes dangerous role.

Or that the culprits make too much noise- complain to MP, proclaim innocence etc, that the authorities waive off the fines

G, [28/1/2026 5:57 pm]

This kind of posture cheapens citizenship

G, [28/1/2026 5:58 pm]

This kind of posture erodes the national identity that the 1G PAP spent so much resources to build

Khai Mun L., [28/1/2026 5:59 pm]

Or claim they have mental disability..

REACH Singapore, [28/1/2026 6:04 pm]

📢 Topic 📢

G, [28/1/2026 6:04 pm]

This kind of posture reveals to us that the PAP govt has moved away from putting Singaporeans first.

Asking Singaporeans to adapt to immigrants rather than the other way around shows Singaporeans are positioned lower than foreigners in PAP's priorities list

And they have muddied the waters for years by using terms like "Singapore residents" so that it has become more and more difficult to distinguish Singaporeans and foreigners statistics right in our own country

G, [28/1/2026 6:07 pm]

All the efforts that our fore fathers put in to work with 1G PAP to build national identity all thrown aside for "we first"

They gave up their dialects for mandarin and English 

Their children listened to 1G PAP and limited their offspring to 2

And foreigners who come in to stay now are not required to have English proficiency

G, [28/1/2026 6:15 pm]

"... want to become part of this bigger fraternity," he added.

Eh. This is not some uni frat club eh. This is Singapore. Not some clubhouse that for you to suka suka let who you like in, and ostracise those who you don't like

Jun Ming, [28/1/2026 6:24 pm]

If we are as big as America or china in terms of size maybe I will allow this rate of people to come in but no sg is just a tiny red dot

G, [28/1/2026 6:26 pm]

As long as national identity is strengthened, not eroded, and put citizens first, most people won't mind immigration

G, [28/1/2026 6:43 pm]

What about foreigners who just come here to park their money, set up "family offices"?  

There's little incentive for them to sink roots and integrate into Singapore society.

There was a dramatic surge in "family offices" set up between 2019 (approx 200) and 2025 (over 2000)

And some of these bring in money from questionable sources.. a number of these were implicated or involved in money laundering activities

It really feels like this 4G PAP govt has sold Singapore out to foreigners

REACH Singapore, [28/1/2026 6:45 pm]

Dear Contributors,

⏰ We will be closing the chat in 15 minutes ⏰

Thank you very much for being part of our Telegram chat and participating actively.

Goodnight!

Megan 😊

REACH Singapore, [28/1/2026 7:00 pm]

Dear Contributors

We will be closing the chat for today.

Thank you very much for being part of our Telegram chat and participating actively.

Goodnight!

Megan 😊


====


Thursday, January 15, 2026

REACH (Telegram) 115 -  What are your views on the latest Polytechnic Graduate Employment Survey results?

(SK)
16 Jan 2026 (10am - 7pm)

REACH (Telegram)
REACH Singapore, [16/1/2026 10:24 am]
Dear Contributors,
Welcome Back! 😊
⏰ We will be opening the chat from 10.25am to 7pm today. ⏰
House Rules (short version of our Terms of Use) to keep in mind:
1. Be kind and respectful. We all want to be in a safe space to share our views.
2. Any and all threatening, abusive, vulgar or racially, religiously and ethnically objectionable content is prohibited.
3. Consider the quiet ones among us and give them a chance to comment.
4. No need to repeat your comment or in different forms (including caps) - we heard you loud and clear the first time.
5. Let's protect each other's privacy and keep contact details in this group what it should always be - confidential.
Full set of Terms of Use: https://www.reach.gov.sg/Participate/reach-telegram-group/REACH-Telegram-Group-Chat-Terms-of-Use/
We will strive to uphold these rules to ensure this is a safe space for all.
Please be assured that the points made by participants during the chat are aggregated and shared with relevant agencies.
The topic will be posted shortly.
Thank you.
Megan 😊
REACH Singapore, [16/1/2026 10:27 am]
📢 Topic 📢
The latest Polytechnic Graduate Employment Survey released on 15 Jan 2026 highlighted that full-time permanent employment for fresh polytechnic graduates stayed stable in 2025, while starting pay continued to rise. The results come amid concerns among tertiary graduates about their job prospects in a more uncertain labour market and volatile economic climate.
💬 What are your views on the latest Polytechnic Graduate Employment Survey results?
The survey reflects graduate employment outcomes six months after graduation, and are expected to improve beyond the six-month mark, the joint statement from the five polytechnics said. Based on labour market data from the Ministry of Manpower, total employment continued to grow in 2025, the statement said.
📌 Key results from the survey
- The overall rate of graduates securing employment (including full-time, temporary, freelance or accepted offers) was about 90% within six months after graduation of after completion of national service, slightly down from 90.4% in 2024.
- 54.2% of them were in full-time permanent jobs in 2025, a slight dip from 54.6% in 2024.
- The median gross monthly salary for those in full-time permanent jobs increased to around S$3,000 in 2025, up from about S$2,900 in 2024.
- The latest results also for the first time gave more details about graduates who have not secured work. This group falls into three categories: those who received but rejected job offers, those who applied but did not receive any offers, and those who did not look for full-time work.
📌 Change in how employment is defined
- For the first time, the survey results broadened its employment definition to include graduates who had already accepted a job offer but had not started work yet and those actively preparing to start a business, in addition to those already working. Previously, only graduates already employed at the time of the survey were counted in the "employed" category.
- The survey also provided more detailed breakdowns of graduates who had not secured employment — such as people who had rejected offers, those who applied but didn’t receive offers, or those who weren’t looking for a job.
📌 Support for Graduates
- Support is available for graduates looking for jobs, including at the polytechnics, from Workforce Singapore and the National Trades Union Congress, and through the Graduate Industry Traineeships.
👉 https://www.channelnewsasia.com/singapore/polytechnic-graduate-employment-survey-jobs-median-salary-work-5860836
👉 https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/parenting-education/full-time-employment-held-steady-for-fresh-poly-graduates-in-2025-with-starting-pay-on-the-rise
👉 https://www.businesstimes.com.sg/singapore/proportion-poly-graduates-who-secured-employment-dips-90-survey
----

REACH Singapore, [16/1/2026 11:01 am]
[ Poll : I feel confident that the job market is favourable for polytechnic graduates. Share your reasons in the chat! ]
- Strongly agree
- Agree
- Neutral
- Disagree
- Strongly disagree
REACH Singapore, [16/1/2026 11:01 am]
[ Poll : I feel secure about my job prospects in Singapore’s current economy. Share your reasons in the chat! ]
- Strongly agree
- Agree
- Neutral
- Disagree
- Strongly disagree
Khai Mun L., [16/1/2026 11:10 am]
the scenarios you mentioned are in the chart.. look at the straits time link
REACH Singapore, [16/1/2026 11:10 am]
Dear Contributors,
Please take a moment to participate in our polls and share your opinion.
The poll questions are pinned for easy reference and your vote is anonymous.
We look forward to hearing your thoughts on today’s topic!
💬 What are your views on the latest Polytechnic Graduate Employment Survey results?
Thank you.
Megan
Khai Mun L., [16/1/2026 11:10 am]
Note that the reports are for poly grads specifically
Daniel, [16/1/2026 11:11 am]
You are right. I stand corrected, my message then is wrong.
Khai Mun L., [16/1/2026 11:12 am]
They might be easier to find jobs because less pay, and have more practical skills compared to uni grads
REACH Singapore, [16/1/2026 12:37 pm]
Dear Contributors,
We want to HEAR MORE from you.
💬 What are your views on the latest Polytechnic Graduate Employment Survey results?
We have had good feedback from this group, and we hope that we can keep the discussion robust and active!
Do also share your opinion by participating in our polls! The poll questions are pinned for easy reference, and your vote is anonymous.
Thank you!
Megan 😊
Jun Ming, [16/1/2026 1:01 pm]
Still studying uni not sure about the market at the moment

LCL (Danny 心), [16/1/2026 1:53 pm]
1. I don't know of poly graduates job opportunities - as my circles are Uni graduates.
2. One of my nephew is poly graduate but has enrol in University and graduated.
3. But not sure he got a job or not as he is doing Green sustainability - got to check with him this coming CNY.
4. But read from the 2nd liner news media, the number of news about fresh graduates from IHLs difficulties in getting jobs has tapered down considerably unlike last year - were quite bad. Alot of such news. Even CNA news broadcast highlight a few documentaries on this. But now also seems to taper down.
5. Not sure on the ground is fresh graduates be it Poly, Uni or ITE - got people having difficulties in securing a job or not.
6. But seems like less tense.

LCL (Danny 心), [16/1/2026 3:04 pm]
Notice alot of disagree and strongly disagree in the polls.
Should voice out here what is happening on the ground.
Else nobody know how is the job market now for the fresh graduates or those unable to secure a job.

Jun Ming, [16/1/2026 3:10 pm]
1st temporary jobs are easy to find but that doesn't mean they are satisfied
Jun Ming, [16/1/2026 3:11 pm]
And is the job related to what they learn in poly is another thing

LCL (Danny 心), [16/1/2026 3:11 pm]
Oh is it true that fresh graduates are taking temp jobs instead of securing a permanent good salary jobs based on what they trained in?

365, [16/1/2026 3:11 pm]
I wouldn't be surprised
Jun Ming, [16/1/2026 3:12 pm]
I mean we need to earn a living
Jun Ming, [16/1/2026 3:12 pm]
Unless 肯老
365, [16/1/2026 3:12 pm]
Not very relatable for me since I'm past that stage of life already, but I wouldn't be surprised if this is the case
Jun Ming, [16/1/2026 3:13 pm]
Some of them work part time in macdonald while waiting for uni can be also consider employed

LCL (Danny 心), [16/1/2026 3:14 pm]
I think those who poll disagree and strongly disagree should post their comments here so that government can take action to address their concerns.
Else only poll but don't know the root causes, government don't know what went wrong.
Wasted your opportunity to rectify issues that is not going right on the ground.

365, [16/1/2026 3:21 pm]
Just speculation here, competition is one of the factors obviously, especially for industries where there's naturally very little open positions available.
For example bio-chemist, to my knowledge not a lot of demand for new labour but there's many graduates every year. Whatever open position by chance, has to be competed amongst so many graduates. And this is not even considering the terms of employment yet.
Second speculation is general hiring freeze due to global uncertainties. Who knows what's going to happen next, will that affect supply chain routes, will that affect demand for production, all these uncertainties might make companies put a pause on any expansion plan and keep risk minimal.
365, [16/1/2026 3:22 pm]
I can't think of an industry off the top of my mind now, if there's one that can self sustain within Singapore itself. We are so globally connected, the current affairs are definitely putting companies on the back foot for any expansion and growth plans.
Jun Ming, [16/1/2026 3:23 pm]
Only healthcare are short of workers
Jun Ming, [16/1/2026 3:23 pm]
Other than that I don't see any much hope as a gen z

LCL (Danny 心), [16/1/2026 3:24 pm]
If biochemistry is not hiring too many workers, then IHLs should reduce the course intakes and let other faculties increase intake.
Should match industry demands to course enrolment.
Else if mismatch, then fresh graduates are not produced to meet industry needs.
Bad for business and bad for fresh graduates.

LCL (Danny 心), [16/1/2026 3:25 pm]
I think IT, AI, finance industries still need alot of workers.

Jun Ming, [16/1/2026 3:25 pm]
Then again the industrial world Change so fast that you don't know what is in demand in the next 3 years
Jun Ming, [16/1/2026 3:26 pm]
IT and finance are dying I think

LCL (Danny 心), [16/1/2026 3:26 pm]
That's why continuous education and upgrading is required.

Jun Ming, [16/1/2026 3:26 pm]
The thing is is our skills still relevant after ns
Jun Ming, [16/1/2026 3:26 pm]
Since 2 years has past

LCL (Danny 心), [16/1/2026 3:27 pm]
Hmm...
Not as I know.
Because IT and finance are still recruiting based on what I know.

Jun Ming, [16/1/2026 3:27 pm]
What I heard they are position but not recruiting
Jun Ming, [16/1/2026 3:27 pm]
So called fake recruiting

LCL (Danny 心), [16/1/2026 3:28 pm]
AI, cybersecurity are still strongly in demands.
Heard that software development still needed even if ChatGpt can produce vibe code.

365, [16/1/2026 3:28 pm]
Bio-chemistry is just an example, how many other courses will have to shrink as well, and then is the total opportunities even commensurate to the population?
It will also feed into a self-serving cycle, fewer people to take up, less interest over time, even less demand for it, then eventually it'll just disappear altogether.
365, [16/1/2026 3:28 pm]
This is also a good point
365, [16/1/2026 3:28 pm]
Whatever is available now, may not match reality 3 years later
365, [16/1/2026 3:29 pm]
IT is a huge spectrum, it is still hiring, but maybe not for what it's most well-known for: software and web development

LCL (Danny 心), [16/1/2026 3:29 pm]
I think IT and finance positions are taken up.
Not fake recruitment.

LCL (Danny 心), [16/1/2026 3:30 pm]
Oh is it.
I read from a news that web and software development still needed.

365, [16/1/2026 3:30 pm]
Not as hot and hyped as the 2 years after covid
Jun Ming, [16/1/2026 3:30 pm]
My classmates say he chose TCM over IT course as it change very fast, don't know if it is still relevant after a few years

LCL (Danny 心), [16/1/2026 3:30 pm]
Understood.

365, [16/1/2026 3:31 pm]
I'm not sure how vibe coding is going to work out, but the technology as it is right now, it's a dud
365, [16/1/2026 3:31 pm]
It can assist to come up with a quick base, that's about it

LCL (Danny 心), [16/1/2026 3:31 pm]
Now AI, cybersecurity and could be quantum computing in demand.

365, [16/1/2026 3:31 pm]
You still need foundational understanding
365, [16/1/2026 3:32 pm]
AI development should be in demand, not AI user. AI user will probably be an expected skill for everyone in future, like using the internet.
365, [16/1/2026 3:33 pm]
Cyber is still hiring, but is quite seasonal
365, [16/1/2026 3:33 pm]
Usually end of year or around Mar/apr period will open up more

LCL (Danny 心), [16/1/2026 3:33 pm]
Yes. ChatGpt vibe code is not the solution that many CEOs thought.
They fire alot of software developers.
Rely on ChatGpt vibe code.
Create a big mess.
Now got to recruit back software developers.
Luckily Singapore business didn't do that.

365, [16/1/2026 3:34 pm]
Cyber also has very few positions that you can join as a fresh grad with an average portfolio

LCL (Danny 心), [16/1/2026 3:34 pm]
Yes AI R&D, AI development, data analytics in high demand.

LCL (Danny 心), [16/1/2026 3:35 pm]
Hmm...
Cybersecurity needs experience professional.
But if don't train up fresh graduates, in future no continuation.
Industry also die.

Jun Ming, [16/1/2026 3:36 pm]
But then as I mentioned after ns most of the guys might already forget 30% of the knowledge, and basic entry jobs are dying
365, [16/1/2026 3:36 pm]
Yup, the "entry level" position is usually a shift based one
Jun Ming, [16/1/2026 3:37 pm]
And some industry by nature eg. Science have lesser vacation for fresh grads
Jun Ming, [16/1/2026 3:38 pm]
When you look in science industry most post need at least a degree
365, [16/1/2026 3:39 pm]
Iirc the government has a program to linkup cooperations with unis for jobs? Not sure if poly has one as well. I'm also a bit blurry on this, need to double check my information
365, [16/1/2026 3:39 pm]
The traineeship program I believe?

LCL (Danny 心), [16/1/2026 3:40 pm]
I think now many companies recruiting intern to be permanent staff.
I come across a few like that.

LCL (Danny 心), [16/1/2026 3:41 pm]
That means, companies more confident in the economy.

365, [16/1/2026 3:41 pm]
SIT has an integrated work study program, I think it's helpful, and perhaps something similar could be implemented across our tertiary educational institutes?
365, [16/1/2026 3:42 pm]
Not part of the curriculum, but maybe a program to help manage such an arrangement, exclusively for Singaporean students
365, [16/1/2026 3:43 pm]
Getting that experience should also help build some connections, and the company could already assess you and is familiar with you upon graduation
365, [16/1/2026 3:43 pm]
It's something I had wanted but I just couldn't make the cut for SIT

LCL (Danny 心), [16/1/2026 3:44 pm]
Important for fresh graduates to secure a good internship.
Try a few to see which one you like and companies that engage you in internship can also measure whether it is a good fit rather than just fresh interview.
Upon internship completion, normally they will recruit the interns as permanent staff.
Previously this is how I recruit my staff.

LCL (Danny 心), [16/1/2026 3:45 pm]
I thought SIT accept all Polytechnic graduates.

Jun Ming, [16/1/2026 3:45 pm]
There's cut off point bro
365, [16/1/2026 3:45 pm]
The course I applied for only had an intake of 80 at the time
Jun Ming, [16/1/2026 3:46 pm]
And based on interview

LCL (Danny 心), [16/1/2026 3:47 pm]
I see.
I not familiar.

365, [16/1/2026 3:48 pm]
Anyway back to topic, rather than coming up with a plan after graduation, why not try to integrate it in while they are studying to improve their opportunities upon graduation.
I think the advantage is that companies do not have to fully commit to a new employment, thus less risk and more acceptance to try out a candidate.
365, [16/1/2026 3:48 pm]
The standard 1 or even 3 months probation is still a risk for companies

LCL (Danny 心), [16/1/2026 3:48 pm]
Actually this is more ideal.

365, [16/1/2026 3:49 pm]
But a short stint with students, and perhaps not even full time at the work, is less risky for companies
365, [16/1/2026 3:49 pm]
They take less risk, more willing to accept, then the students have more opportunities to learn and showcase what they can pick up and perform.

LCL (Danny 心), [16/1/2026 3:50 pm]
I prefer internship and then company recruiting.
Win win for both sides.

Jun Ming, [16/1/2026 3:51 pm]
From my Intel gov not really hiring also
365, [16/1/2026 3:51 pm]
I think there's some fundamental differences, for internship you're working full time, the work study program is some days in school some days at work, some days even half half
365, [16/1/2026 3:52 pm]
In this case there's argument for a lower costing for companies also, since it's not like a full time employment
Jun Ming, [16/1/2026 3:52 pm]
Base on TikTok moe is just maintaining the numbers of teachers in school and not expanding hiring

LCL (Danny 心), [16/1/2026 3:52 pm]
Oh is it true?

365, [16/1/2026 3:53 pm]
Internship is akin to a full-time contract employment, just that the responsibilities and contract period is minor
Jun Ming, [16/1/2026 3:53 pm]
Yes. Those with job openings are usually post with high turn off rate
Jun Ming, [16/1/2026 3:54 pm]
My friend work in HDB said she wants to cry as the workload is just too heavy

LCL (Danny 心), [16/1/2026 3:54 pm]
Understood.
I think work study program has its merit.
But not many companies have resources for such tight integration except those big ones.
Hence internship is 2nd best.

Jun Ming, [16/1/2026 3:54 pm]
It's emotionally daunting to her
Jun Ming, [16/1/2026 3:55 pm]
So work culture is another part of story

LCL (Danny 心), [16/1/2026 3:55 pm]
But her superior should control the workload.
Last time I allocate the work fairly and always check on their workload.

Jun Ming, [16/1/2026 3:56 pm]
No eh gov all by system de
Jun Ming, [16/1/2026 3:56 pm]
Don't know why allocate so many case to her

LCL (Danny 心), [16/1/2026 3:56 pm]
Thought government more balance in dishing out workload compared to the private sector.

LCL (Danny 心), [16/1/2026 3:57 pm]
Huh..
You mean system allocate?
The project I dish out cannot be allocated by system.

Jun Ming, [16/1/2026 3:57 pm]
Ya. You need to respond to people complain to one service

LCL (Danny 心), [16/1/2026 3:58 pm]
Oh I see.
Public fronting customer service.

Jun Ming, [16/1/2026 3:58 pm]
So somehow she needs to handle more complain than her collegue according to her lah
Jun Ming, [16/1/2026 3:58 pm]
And she need to go on site to talk also
365, [16/1/2026 3:59 pm]
Government jobs in general are just more systemic than private, can be either good or bad.

LCL (Danny 心), [16/1/2026 3:59 pm]
Her superior should step in if she raise the workload.
Superior usually can solve the problem.

Jun Ming, [16/1/2026 4:00 pm]
Sometimes it's people problem or organisation problem
Jun Ming, [16/1/2026 4:01 pm]
Basically if there's high turn off rate on a certain position, gov need to investigate

LCL (Danny 心), [16/1/2026 4:01 pm]
Depends on the project you handle.
Routine jobs more systemic.
Bigger projects depends on human allocation because it needs multiple skillsets to handle.

Jun Ming, [16/1/2026 4:01 pm]
And don't be stingy to open new position
365, [16/1/2026 4:02 pm]
Systemic as in more rigid structure and processes, not just about allocation.
A lot of bureaucracy.
365, [16/1/2026 4:03 pm]
Counts towards budget ah, need to answer to citizens also
Jun Ming, [16/1/2026 4:03 pm]
And look at moe why are they not expanding teacher forces with so many teachers complain heavy workload

LCL (Danny 心), [16/1/2026 4:04 pm]
I think government also cannot expand uncontrollablly.
They keep their headcount according to needs.
Singapore civil service is the most efficient and effective - and keep headcount reasonable not over staff.
Need to employ automation to cut unnecessary expenses and keep productivity high.
And rated best in the world.

LCL (Danny 心), [16/1/2026 4:04 pm]
Else taxpayers got to pay high tax to keep civil service

Jun Ming, [16/1/2026 4:05 pm]
Well that's why I object to bring in so many foreigner to be Singaporean. As resources is just this much, bringing in more people will mean some people lose out and no resources
Jun Ming, [16/1/2026 4:06 pm]
Only truly foreign talent and those have the intention to open business to come in
365, [16/1/2026 4:10 pm]
Issue is, who's to be the judge on whether these foreigners are beneficial or not.
Have to keep in mind that many of our job opportunities are from international organizations, who were promised access to a wide-range of talents, not just Singaporeans, and they get to pick and choose based on merits and according to their wants and needs.
I believe there's some sort of correlation with regards to free employment and free trade. Even now it's not exactly completely free, there are some restrictions.
365, [16/1/2026 4:11 pm]
The stricter you are on the labour market availability, the less enticing we will be as a hub for foreign investments, and could end up losing a lot of jobs instead if they choose to pull out.
Jun Ming, [16/1/2026 4:11 pm]
At least gov job should have restrictions
Jun Ming, [16/1/2026 4:11 pm]
Civil servants
365, [16/1/2026 4:11 pm]
That I'd agree to
Jun Ming, [16/1/2026 4:11 pm]
Since job openings are limited
365, [16/1/2026 4:13 pm]
Barring specific jobs where there's an urgency to cover, civil service jobs should be for Singaporeans only. And if there's an urgency and really unable to fill with Singaporeans, then should restrict to a contract role only

LCL (Danny 心), [16/1/2026 4:14 pm]
Civil service predominantly are Singaporeans.
Unless talents needed are not available and less sensitive roles, then got PRs.

365, [16/1/2026 4:16 pm]
I'm not sure what the composition of the employees under government paycheck is, but my stance is to have Singaporeans helm them as much as possible, and any employment of foreigners should be temporary at best, i.e contract role.

LCL (Danny 心), [16/1/2026 4:19 pm]
I doubt got foreigners on work pass except contract jobs.
But PRs yes.
Many become new citizens.
My 1st senior is a PR and my previous immediate boss is a PR.
Now they are citizens.
In fact their whole families including their children are citizens now.

365, [16/1/2026 4:20 pm]
I think in the case for PR, they can have access to more roles than non-PRs, but the level of the position should be limited.
Jun Ming, [16/1/2026 4:22 pm]
And for new citizens may I ask to be pr to work at least 10 yrs-15 yrs in Singapore to integrate before becoming citizens

LCL (Danny 心), [16/1/2026 4:22 pm]
That's why Singaporeans are still predominant.
PRs only when we lack talents and less sensitive roles they will take.

LCL (Danny 心), [16/1/2026 4:23 pm]
Not sure about the criteria.
Only immigration will know.
Not all succeed to be citizens.
The criteria to be citizens very tough.

Jun Ming, [16/1/2026 4:23 pm]
So far 2 yrs of pr can apply for citizenship
Jun Ming, [16/1/2026 4:24 pm]
Which I think too short

LCL (Danny 心), [16/1/2026 4:24 pm]
Not all succeed.
Some 10 years still cannot get.

LCL (Danny 心), [16/1/2026 4:24 pm]
Unless the pr contribution to Singapore very big.

LCL (Danny 心), [16/1/2026 4:25 pm]
My senior and my previous boss should meet this criteria.
Because they help to do many big national projects.

Khai Mun L., [16/1/2026 6:13 pm]
I replied neutral in 2nd poll because generally the job market is not fantastic, is rather flat.
Companies are not actively hiring due to global business instability and AI cost cutting
Khai Mun L., [16/1/2026 6:13 pm]
It doesn't only affect graduates, but all other workers

LCL (Danny 心), [16/1/2026 6:13 pm]
Goodness.

LCL (Danny 心), [16/1/2026 6:14 pm]
So the economic resiliency taskforce should address this.

Khai Mun L., [16/1/2026 6:19 pm]
What sg can do is limited though. We are affected by global events.
Covid, wars, tariffs, inflation, AI take over existing jobs etc..

LCL (Danny 心), [16/1/2026 6:26 pm]
SG government can address:-
1. Finding new markets.
2. Expanding existing markets.
3. New collaboration to expand regional markets.
4. Find synergetic collaboration to re-engineer new supply chain.

5. How to infuse AI into jobs to complement workers and business instead of replacing workers like the centralised redesign centre.

I roughly able to size up virtually the economic resiliency taskforce are moving towards the above initiatives.
I think they will be able to announce the concrete initiatives soon.
We should hear some of it during Budget 2026 come 12 Feb I think.

LCL (Danny 心), [16/1/2026 6:28 pm]
I don't have privy information.
But I can sense the above happenings.

Jun Ming, [16/1/2026 6:28 pm]
https://www.instagram.com/p/DTkCmkyE2UG/?igsh=MW9zZ2hjdGpuMHpzMA==
Jun Ming, [16/1/2026 6:29 pm]
Saw this on Instagram

LCL (Danny 心), [16/1/2026 6:30 pm]
Interview that is why not a good approach for recruitment.
Internships better gauge for both candidates and business.

Jun Ming, [16/1/2026 6:32 pm]
But salary are bad. The main purpose of a job is to earn money
Jun Ming, [16/1/2026 6:33 pm]
Sometimes parents see it this way

LCL (Danny 心), [16/1/2026 6:33 pm]
Initially the salary is nominal.
But after conversion into permanent jobs, salary often revised.

Jun Ming, [16/1/2026 6:35 pm]
Initially I got a job offer that gives me 1.8k my parents straight away object it
Jun Ming, [16/1/2026 6:35 pm]
That's why I stuck studying instead of working

LCL (Danny 心), [16/1/2026 6:35 pm]
Huh, I thought you should decide whether it is suitable for you and whether it got potential?
Your parents not in touch with the company won't know what is best for you.

Jun Ming, [16/1/2026 6:37 pm]
Older generation see it as money money money
Jun Ming, [16/1/2026 6:38 pm]
They even compare the salary to a cleaner
Jun Ming, [16/1/2026 6:40 pm]
Their logic is simple.i pay so much for your studies not let you earn something equivalent to a cleaner

LCL (Danny 心), [16/1/2026 6:40 pm]
I don't interfere with my son decision.
Internship, salary, the company he attached to, the type of course he takes, and finally securing the scholarship.
He make all the decisions by himself.
Then he discuss with me.
Most of the time, he let me know why and how he arrives at his decision.
I will mostly support or give advices.
But I don't ban his ideas.

LCL (Danny 心), [16/1/2026 6:41 pm]
His intern pay also very little.
 (Cleaner pay)
Now he earn alot (higher than median pay).

Jun Ming, [16/1/2026 6:44 pm]
Sometimes parents just don't see it.

LCL (Danny 心), [16/1/2026 6:44 pm]
That's why children must be wise.
Parents also must be wise.

REACH Singapore, [16/1/2026 6:45 pm]
Dear Contributors,
⏰ We will be closing the chat in 15 minutes ⏰
Thank you very much for being part of our Telegram chat and participating actively.
Goodnight!
Megan 😊
REACH Singapore, [16/1/2026 6:59 pm]
Dear Contributors
We will be closing the chat for today.
Thank you very much for being part of our Telegram chat and participating actively.
Goodnight!
Megan 😊


====