Saturday, July 18, 2020


6 seconds ago
In fact I am getting more sceptical whether democratic system is it really a beneficial system for governance - as there is a possibility to vote in incompetent politicians or a political parties like trump, Brexit, coalition parties like Malaysia that keep changing govt like changing clothes.
ricky l
20 seconds ago
(1) Trump is the greatest failure outcome of democracy - a total inept President voted in by voters.

(2) Brexit is the greatest policy failure - voted in by British voters.

(3) Malaysian coalition formation and breakage, changing of government like changing clothes - is the result of fail democracy.

-- Now US, UK and Malaysia - become weaker as a result of the negative outcomes of democracy ---- are voters the best decision-makers that make a Country successful?


  • ricky l
    16 seconds ago
    (1) Now in US - American voters have become the greatest loser - many death, economic doldrums, losing global leadership and influence.

    (2) In UK - UK voters become the greatest Brexit losers, economic uncertainty.

    (3) In Malaysia - Malaysian voters become the greatest losers that vote for change - as malaysian politics is now unstable, volatile without a strong government.
42 minutes ago
you are right, Winston Churchill put this best, "The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voters ", you will know when democracy will fail by looking at the news, when you found that the news are more interesting than shows on TV, YOU HAVE A PROBLEM
23 minutes ago
Perhaps you’d be happier in a country with an autocratic system of governance. I hear North Korea is lovely this time of year. Bon voyage!

1 second ago
(1) Democracy is the not best political system to choose a Government.

(2) Neither is Communism the best political system to choose a Government.
Straits Times
GE2020 results a ‘clear mandate’ although 61.2 per cent vote share lower than 65 per cent PAP hoped for: Lawrence Wong
18 July 2020
The PAP will also have to address the “real economic pain” that a substantial segment of *people in their 40s and 50s*  are feeling, he added.
This sandwiched group, who are looking after elderly parents and also caring for young children, *was facing difficulties even before the Covid-19 crisis*, he said.
---
[5:07 pm, 14/07/2020] ☸️  Danny 心:
Topic :- How to remain united in the face of covid.
(2)  What are the factos the cause the souring of the mood that impact unity :-
i. Job lost - many young graduates have problem finding jobs. (Some are lucky to find internships, temp jobs, traineeship. But some who try on their own - cannot find jobs after graduate for a year or more).
*Mid career PMETs and workers - who lose jobs (even before the covid hit)* - and have trouble finding jobs.
===

Straits Times
GE2020 results a ‘clear mandate’ although 61.2 per cent vote share lower than 65 per cent PAP hoped for: Lawrence Wong
18 July 2020
Mr Wong said the *election outcome  could also have been worse*, especially given the difficulties that people were facing on the ground.
---
[5:07 pm, 14/07/2020] ☸️  Danny 心:
Topic :- How to remain united in the face of covid.
(1) The covid has posed a tremendous threat to people's live, jobs and the Economy.
This has tremendously sour the mood of the people which impact unity.
*If not for the 4 consecutive budgets that help to cushion the finance of many Singaporeans --- the outcome could be worst*.

====

Straits Times
GE2020 results a ‘clear mandate’ although 61.2 per cent vote share lower than 65 per cent PAP hoped for: Lawrence Wong
18 July 2020
"In particular, there was a fall in support amongst those in their 40s and 50s, and perhaps even those in their early 60s."
This group of older voters swung against the PAP due to economic hardship, Mr Wong said. They included people who had suffered income or job losses, had their *businesses disrupted*, or been forced to downsize to lower-paying occupations.
---
[5:07 pm, 14/07/2020] ☸️  Danny 心:
Topic :- How to remain united in the face of covid.
ii. *Business loss* - many business have close shops despite helps from the Government with 4 Budgets and some businesses barely survive.
This is also one of the factors that make business owners and employee feel insecure and sour the mood.
iii. Covid-19 threat - that people feel their lives are threatened as well as social distancing measures the inconvenience people (though these are needed to save lives).
====

My post mortem and analysis immediately after GE2020 - is in synch with Government analysis of why some votes swing away from PAP


====

Thursday, July 16, 2020





COMMENT: Dear PAP, here's how to win back the youth vote


Yahoo News Singapore 16 Jul 2020
ricky l
7 seconds ago
(1) There must be consequences for those who vote those MPs that represent them.

(2) Only then democracy will work.

(3) In US, state governor attract their investor, provide jobs in their state and implement policies they believe in --- different from the national or federal policy.
Those states who are run well, voters will stay, else they will move out of the states they stay in or vote out their state governor.

(4) So assume sengkang grc vote for WP - should let the voters in grc run by WP - eg. WP advocate draw out CPF by 55 years, set minimum wages, people lose their jobs in their wards --- then WP should create jobs for their voters in their wards.

(5) Overtime, let the voters decide whether WP can govern or not. The voters in the Oppie wards should live with the consequences - based on what they vote for.

(6) Only then democracy will work - when consequences are tie to what they vote.

(7) Singapore has no strategic depth - so by letting voters live with the consequences - people will vote wisely.


ricky l
50 seconds ago
“Sigh….” — Ho Ching’s response to Jamus Lim’s clarification on minimum wage
Professor now says burden is borne mostly by higher prices consumers pay and in part by firms

Photos: AFP, YT screencapture
AUTHOR
Jewel Stolarchuk
DATE
July 16, 2020
CATEGORY

Featured NewsHome NewsSingapore PoliticsSocio-Political

Share
- Advertisement -


Singapore — Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s wife, Ms Ho Ching, has expressed what appears to be concern over Workers’ Party MP-elect Jamus Lim’s position on a minimum wage.

Professor Lim, an economist, shot to fame when he took part in a televised pre-election debate on July 1 with the People’s Action Party’s Dr Vivian Balakrishnan, the Singapore Democratic Party’s Dr Chee Soon Juan and the Progress Singapore Party’s Mr Francis Yuen.

Those who saw the debate felt that Prof Lim was able to hold his own against Dr Balakrishnan and came off as eloquent and level-headed.

During the debate, they had clashed over who will bear the fiscal burden of the policies featured in the WP’s manifesto and Prof Lim had asserted that the WP’s manifesto promises are “budget-neutral”.

- Advertisement -


Days later, on July 10, Prof Lim was elected to Parliament when the WP won Sengkang GRC.

On Tuesday afternoon (July 14), Prof Lim addressed concerns about the WP’s minimum wage proposal and indicated that the fiscal burden of minimum wage would be borne mostly by consumers who buy products or services with higher prices and, in part, by firms. He wrote:

“Who pays for the minimum wage? Some people think this would cost the government. Actually, most min wage models have no fiscal impact, and the burden is borne mostly by higher prices consumers pay (3/4), and in part by firms (1/4).

“I see this as a feature, not a bug. The point is to redistribute some bargaining power from capital to labour, and I think we can afford to chip in a little to take care of the least well-off in society. With many more buyers than min wage workers, the price effect will be small.”

He added that the Government’s Progressive Wage Model (PWM) is not equivalent to a minimum wage model and that it does not work for the 100,000 workers the WP estimates earn below the minimum wage.

In the hours after Prof Lim’s clarification was published, a Facebook post began circulating suggesting that his latest statement is at odds with his statement in the debate that WP’s manifesto is budget-neutral.

The page that made the post, Singapore Matters, wrote:

“Minimum wage is not manna from heaven. Someone’s got to pay for it. The burden is on businesses and YOU. You will pay for it through higher prices. And this means a higher cost of living.

“When prices go up, it is the low wage workers who will be more hurt. It surely does not warm the cockles of your heart to learn that you bear 3/4 of the burden of a minimum wage.”

Ms Ho was one of the first few people to agree with the Singapore Matters post. Ms Ho, who also serves as CEO of Singapore sovereign wealth fund Temasek Holdings, shared the post about 15 minutes after it was published with the caption: “Sigh….”

Her post sharing the Singapore Matters picture is trending on social media. More than 300 people reacted to her post, which has accumulated over 200 comments and nearly 100 shares:




1 second ago
Eg.

(1) US have to live with Trump for 4 years.

(2) Malaysia will have to live with changing of government like changing clothes.

(3) UK got to live with Brexit.

(4) These are the consequences that the voters will have to live with - when they vote in the wrong politicians --- and the voters will have to bear with the consequences - for what they vote for.

(5) There must be consequences for those who vote for opposition wards.

(6) Democracy will only work - if there are consequences.

(7) Else voters anyhow vote - thinking that "Ah Gong" will bail them out - if the opposition MPs "tak jalan".

Tuesday, July 14, 2020







GE2020: PSP will 'respect' WP's Pritam Singh as Leader of the Opposition - Tan Cheng Bock




View photos


Progress Singapore Party's Tan Cheng Bock and Workers' Party's Pritam Singh. (PHOTOS: Dhany Osman/Yahoo News Singapore)
SINGAPORE — Progress Singapore Party (PSP) will “go along with” Workers’ Party (WP) chief Pritam Singh since he was appointed the Leader of the Opposition after the 2020 General Election (GE), said PSP’s secretary-general Tan Cheng Bock on Tuesday (14 July).
“WP was given the leader for opposition (role) and I think ...since he (Pritam) is the leader there, my two friends here will respect him as leader and will go along with him,” said Dr Tan at a PSP press conference.
He was referring to his two party members Hazel Poa and Leong Mun Wai, who were unveiled as the PSP’s Non-Constituency Members of Parliament (NCMP) at the conference.
Both Poa and Leong were part of PSP’s West Coast group representation constituency (GRC) team at the GE on 10 July. The PSP lost narrowly to the People’s Action Party (PAP) in the GRC, with a margin of 48.31 per cent of the vote share against the PAP’s 51.69 per cent.



View photos


Progress Singapore Party announced on 14 July 2020 that its members Hazel Poa and Leong Mun Wai will be the NCMPs at the next Parliament. (PHOTO: Koh Wan Ting/Yahoo News Singapore)

Under the NCMP scheme, up to 12 seats are offered to the opposition, depending on the outcome of a GE. As the Workers’ Party had won 10 elected seats, the PSP was offered two NCMP positions as the “best loser”.
WP’s performance at the polls - with wins in Sengkang GRC, Aljunied GRC and Hougang SMC - prompted Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong to name WP’s Singh as the Leader of the Opposition.
Dr Tan noted the position and said his party would follow the WP’s lead, noting his personal relationship with the WP secretary-general and its chairman Sylvia Lim.
“Historically, I’ve been quite close to Pritam and Sylvia, we’ve always been very good friends, and we share many many common things, ideals and policies also... we are now going like a team. WP will take the lead, we will help them,” said Dr Tan.
Leong said that the policies of PSP and WP on tackling problems faced by Singaporeans were “more or less aligned” so that there was “room to cooperate” on that front.
Asked if the PSP plans to collaborate with WP outside of Parliament, Poa said that it was “premature” to talk about the issue as her party had just made its decision to take up the NCMP seats.
“We have not yet had an opportunity to discuss this further with WP. So maybe at a later stage, we'll be able to answer that question better,” said Poa.
At a virtual press conference on Sunday, Lim said the WP was ready to work with whichever party that planned to take up the NCMP seats, in order to play the role of a rational and constructive opposition in Parliament.
Follow Yahoo News Singapore’s GE2020 coverage here.
Stay in the know on-the-go: Join Yahoo Singapore's Telegram channel at http://t.me/YahooSingapore
ricky
36 viewing
  • ricky l
    2 seconds ago
    (1) Oppositions confer with the "Leader of the Opposition" - must demonstrate that they can form shadow cabinet and provide alternative policies to govern.

    (2) Demonstrating "alternative voice" and "check and balance" - will no longer make voters happy.

    (3) Voters will be assessing the opposition capabilities - whether they have the substance to govern Singapore and how they fare against the PAP.

    (4) A higher standard of appraisal will be accorded to the Oppositions on how they perform in the Parliament by the voters.

    (5) Now the ball is on the Oppositions court.
20 seconds ago
(1) The same benchmark to assess the PAP governance - will be applied to the Oppositions.

(2) Oppositions must demonstrate that they are on par in governance with PAP - in Parliament.

(3) If Oppositions cannot prove that they can provide alternative policies to run Singapore that are comparable to the PAP - then voters will make their voice known comes the next General Election.

(4) In Parliament, there are no "free ride" - whether to Oppositions or incumbent.

1 second ago
(1) Politics is about dealing with our lives, livelihood, our Economy and our futures.

(2) We will not take the politics lightly.

(3) Oppositions must demonstrate they are of the same caliber and status of the PAP - to be able to govern Singapore and solve Singapore's problem.

(4) If Oppositions fail to demonstrate such capabilities - then voters will make their votes count come next General Election.